![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Throw-in is from the spot nearest the foul. POI has nothing to do with it.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
|
I see what you are saying I was using POI because the game was interrupted. We are talking about the spot on the floor though.
|
|
|||
|
It would if scoring a basket is an interruption to the game.
|
|
||||
|
The point of POI is to put the ball back where it would have gone had the game not been interrupted. IOW, how do we move on as if it didn't happen. Every time POI is used (double fouls, accidental whistle, etc), that's the purpose. So the POI is not the result of the interruption.
In the play in question, the interruption is the foul, the POI is the basket and ensuing throwin.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
|
The spot nearest the foul.
POI is used only when there's a double foul, an inadvertant whistle, a correctable error, ... It's not used when there's a single foul (except for most single non-flagrant T's in NCAA) or a false double foul, .... So, it's not relevant in your play. Terminology matters. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
So no there was no application of POI by definition in the play. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|