Did we get it right?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

As long as the ball was released before A2's foul, you got it right.

Originally Posted by zac

A1 try in the air. A2 fouls B1 after shot, but before made goal. B not in the bonus. We counted the 2 points for A, reported the foul on A2, and continued with a B throw-in. Just checking. Thanks

[mbyron]

I take it that BktBallRef was merely emphasizing the importance of the order for this particular play. As posted, they got it right. If the foul had happened first, it would have been TC, dead ball, no shot.

What's the call if they happen simultaneously?

[grunewar]

Originally Posted by mbyron

What's the call if they happen simultaneously?

Ya get with your partner(s) and make sure one happened just a split second before the other, report it, and move on.

Troublemaker!

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Yes, and Team B may run the end line during the throw-in.

What if the foul didn't happen near the end-line?

Originally Posted by mbyron

What's the call if they happen simultaneously?

Impossible, by rule.

[Indianaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

What if the foul didn't happen near the end-line?

7-5 ART. 7 . . . After a goal or awarded goal as in 7-4-3, the team not credited with the score shall make the throw-in from the end of the court where the goal was made and from any point outside the end line.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Indianaref

7-5 ART. 7 . . . After a goal or awarded goal as in 7-4-3, the team not credited with the score shall make the throw-in from the end of the court where the goal was made and from any point outside the end line.

Look for the rule dealing with the throwin spots. If you just go by this rule, then B would get the ball even if they committed a foul.

[eg-italy]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Look for the rule dealing with the throwin spots. If you just go by this rule, then B would get the ball even if they committed a foul.

Really? You must be joking.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by eg-italy

Really? You must be joking.

Not joking so much as making a point. My point was the rule quoted doesn't really apply to this situation, or the result would be as I posted.

[The R]

Had something similar this weekend....A1 drives the lane and shoots. B1 comes running over from middle of the lane and attempts to block shot. A1 returns to the floor and then is run over by B1 whose momentum carried him through A1.

I whistle the foul from lead. My partner tells me the shot went in. So we count the basket and A has a throw-in from the point of the interruption since A1 had returned to the floor and was no longer an airborne shooter.

[just another ref]

Ya get with your partner(s) and make sure one happened just a split second before the other, report it, and move on.

Just like on a blarge.

Impossible, by rule.

Just like a blarge.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

What if the foul didn't happen near the end-line?

Good point, bob.

If the foul by A2 took place in a location on the floor which would not result in a throw-in somewhere along the end line of Team B's backcourt, then the throw-in would simply be a designated-spot throw-in from the OOB location nearest to where the foul was committed.

That was something worth pointing out to people.

[cdaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

What if the foul didn't happen near the end-line?.

Oooo. Good question.

My gut says spot throw in from the appropriate spot determined by the location of the foul. BUT that would in a way permit the fouling team to gain an advantage, so to speak, of negating the advantage team B would have to run the endline after a made basket.

Gonna have to check the books on that. Dont have them at my desk.

[edit: serves me right to respond to the post before reading to the end of the thread to see if anyone answered the question. Thanks Nevada. -Clark]

[Adam]

Just to answer your point about the advantage; it's a wash. As an offense, would you rather have an endline throwin or a spot throwin on the sideline, further down court?

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by mbyron

I take it that BktBallRef was merely emphasizing the importance of the order for this particular play. As posted, they got it right. If the foul had happened first, it would have been TC, dead ball, no shot.

Exactly. NVRef is just being his normal smartass know-it-all self.