|
It looks as though the treatment of NFHS 2.10.1(A), and NCAA A.R. 27 are the same. Both cases involve team A not shooting a FT that should have been awarded, and in both cases, team A still had possession when the error was discovered. Therefore, we would line up to shoot the FT('s) as normal.
In the OP's case, B rebounded and called a TO. So, since there was a change of possession, A would shoot the second of 2, with no one on the lane, and play would resume at POI, which was a throw-in for B closest to the spot where they were when the TO was requested.
Am I missing something, or is it the same under both codes?
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.
(Used with permission.)
|
Tue Feb 17, 2009, 03:06pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
