View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 17, 2009, 04:24pm
bob jenkins bob jenkins is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy View Post
It looks as though the treatment of NFHS 2.10.1(A), and NCAA A.R. 27 are the same. Both cases involve team A not shooting a FT that should have been awarded, and in both cases, team A still had possession when the error was discovered. Therefore, we would line up to shoot the FT('s) as normal.
Are you using this year's FED case book?

The play, which seems to be what the OP is asking:

*2.10.1 SITUATION A: A1 is fouled and entitled to two free throws under the
double-bonus rule, however, the officials indicate a one-and-one bonus situation.
The first attempt is unsuccessful; B4 rebounds the ball and passes it up to B2.
The error is discovered with B2 in possession of the live ball near mid-court.
RULING: The error is discovered within the correctable error timeframe, and shall
be corrected. Team B securing the rebound and passing to a teammate constitutes
no change in team possession. Therefore, A1 will receive the merited free
throw with players on the lane and play resumes from the free throw. (2-10-1a)
Reply With Quote