Over the back, ON the back RM article

[Nevadaref]

No, I'm not a subscriber nor do I even have a copy of the article.
Perhaps someone else will post some extracts for our bashing pleasure.

[Indianaref]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Perhaps someone else will post some extracts for our bashing pleasure.

Everyone knows you are the Masterbasher.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

No, I'm not a subscriber nor do I even have a copy of the article.
Perhaps someone else will post some extracts for our bashing pleasure.

Did you read someone else's copy? How the hell do you know the author is wrong if you don't even have a copy of the article? just going by what one of your buddies told you?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

Did you read someone else's copy?

Yes, while sitting next to a buddy at a meeting.

[Forksref]

I think some folks in here are choosing to ignore what Legal Guarding Position is. In some cases you may choose to have a no-call, but it is certainly not a charge if you don't have LGP established.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Forksref

I think some folks in here are choosing to ignore what Legal Guarding Position is. In some cases you may choose to have a no-call, but it is certainly not a charge if you don't have LGP established.

You can clearly have a PC foul without the defender having LGP. The LGP just gives the defender additional rights (the right to move to mainitain position).

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Forksref

I think some folks in here are choosing to ignore what Legal Guarding Position is. In some cases you may choose to have a no-call, but it is certainly not a charge if you don't have LGP established.

Please consult 4-19-6 on page 51 and 6-7-7 on pages 82 and 83 of the 2007-08 NFHS Simplified & Illustrated book.

The accompanying pictures have the defender facing away from the offensive player. The defender is said to have "legal position on the court" and the ruling is a player control foul.

LGP has nothing to do with it. Both you and the author of the RM article are failing to grasp that.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Forksref

I think some folks in here are choosing to ignore what Legal Guarding Position is. In some cases you may choose to have a no-call, but it is certainly not a charge if you don't have LGP established.

I was going to take you to task for not understanding the rules, but NevadaRef did that for me already.

MTD, Sr.