The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 20, 2009, 11:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 569
OK, I have tried twice to get an answer to this. This makes three times and my last. If we are taking this thread to the "bra" stage surely we can take it to the tights stage. Can a player wear tights only (for religous reasons) as the pants to his uniform? They are not worn below the uniform shorts.

3.5.6 sitB

I know that Nevada, Bob and BBRef have opinions (all of which I value) on this. Help me out, is it legal?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 20, 2009, 11:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 552
I just really don't want to start having to inspect codpieces...
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 21, 2009, 12:03am
In Time Out
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
oh what is the rule on a girl wearing a bow- I guess it was a bow. But just the back of her hair like a strungy or whatever the heck they are called. Doesn't go around her whole head.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 21, 2009, 12:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by mutantducky View Post
oh what is the rule on a girl wearing a bow- I guess it was a bow. But just the back of her hair like a strungy or whatever the heck they are called. Doesn't go around her whole head.
If it is a hair control device, it is legal. If it is a head decoration, it is illegal. Determine which one it it is and rule accordingly.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 21, 2009, 12:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juulie Downs View Post
I just really don't want to start having to inspect codpieces...
Cracking up!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 21, 2009, 08:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scratch85 View Post
OK, I have tried twice to get an answer to this. This makes three times and my last. If we are taking this thread to the "bra" stage surely we can take it to the tights stage. Can a player wear tights only (for religous reasons) as the pants to his uniform? They are not worn below the uniform shorts.

3.5.6 sitB

I know that Nevada, Bob and BBRef have opinions (all of which I value) on this. Help me out, is it legal?
A player doesn't need religious reasons to wear pants. Any player can wear pants for any reason.

And I think Nevada is wrong that tights aren't pants (for purposes of legality in this situation). I have no doubt they qualify - at least until the NFHS gets into the business of defining pants material and fit - as pants for the purposes of this rule.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 21, 2009, 08:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Tights are always illegal. If players wish to participate without exposing their legs, the rules provide a means: they may wear trousers (provided that the trousers are otherwise legal).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 21, 2009, 08:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Tights are always illegal. If players wish to participate without exposing their legs, the rules provide a means: they may wear trousers (provided that the trousers are otherwise legal).
mbyron...explain how tights don't meet the definition in the book of 'trousers'.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 21, 2009, 08:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
mbyron...explain how tights don't meet the definition in the book of 'trousers'.
They would if 'trousers' were defined in the book. They're one kind. But they're specifically prohibited by 3-5-6. That prohibition does not extend to every kind (the book uses the term 'pants/skirt' not trousers).
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 21, 2009, 08:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
I don't think 3-5-6 prohibits wearing tights as pants...just wearing tights that extend below pants/skirt.

I don't see any way to distinguish tights from other types of pants.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fashion Police Zoochy Basketball 50 Tue Jan 09, 2007 08:12pm
Have you had to be the fashion police? LarryS Basketball 32 Thu Nov 30, 2006 01:22am
fashion police? Junker Basketball 39 Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:16pm
Question for the Fashion Police emaxos Softball 16 Thu Jul 07, 2005 06:10am
Socks? We don't need no stinkin socks!!!!!! sm_bbcoach Football 6 Mon Aug 30, 2004 03:54pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1