Bench Technical vs. Player Technical

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

There is no "easy remedy" for this. If it was a team follower who made the remark, then it should have been an admin T. If it was a Team Member, then it should have been a Class A tech on the team member. You can't say, "it was someone on the team, but I don't know who, so I'll make it an admin T." The official apparently knew who it was, or made a mistake. Shrug. It happens.

How about this, Bob?
10-5-1 Penalty:
"An assessed technical foul that cannot be charged to an individual shall be charged to the head coach (ex. Art. 1.f)."

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

How about this, Bob?
10-5-1 Penalty:
"An assessed technical foul that cannot be charged to an individual shall be charged to the head coach (ex. Art. 1.f)."

That seems (to me) to apply to Players and Subs -- not to Bench Personnel, who are covered under 10-5-2, and only when the Player / Sub cannot get a T (using the example given of a DQ player), not when the offender is not known.

Your later case play cite seems more on target, but it's still not an Admin T as the OP seems to want.

All that said, I work far more NCAAW than NCAAM, so my knowledge of some of the finer points of the rules is a little suspect for NCAAM.