Throw-In BC Violation

[Adam]

Originally Posted by CMHCoachNRef

This exception to the exception (ball tipped by B2 negates the normal exception permitted A2) is one of these situations that I understand completely, but with which I disagree completely as well.

Such over and back violations cause angst every time we call them. This is right up there with the last-touch-first-touch over and back violation.

I'm okay with the last-touch-first-touch thing. I do think, however, that they should expand the exception to all situations where there is no team control. The rule would be shorter, too. "A player whose team is not in control...."

[AKOFL]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I'm okay with the last-touch-first-touch thing. I do think, however, that they should expand the exception to all situations where there is no team control. The rule would be shorter, too. "A player whose team is not in control...."

That is exactly how the rule reads. Are you trying to confuse me? lol

[Adam]

Originally Posted by AKOFL

That is exactly how the rule reads. Are you trying to confuse me? lol

My way would remove the parethetical specifics that follow.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

My way would remove the parethetical specifics that follow.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Nah, I'm saving that for the AP arrow changes I want.