![]() |
|
|
|||
You can only have poi in the game if you accompany it with a crab dribble.
![]()
__________________
Yom HaShoah |
|
|||
Quote:
If the ball had been touched before the double foul, then we would have no team control and NOT during the throw-in, so we would go to the arrow. |
|
|||
Quote:
Not entirely the same, but bear with me. During a shot attempt a double foul occurs do you not go to the arrow for the subsequent throw-in? Why? Because team control is not established. During a throw in would be the same. At disposal, no one has team control, so subsequent throw in is via the AP. Last edited by eyezen; Tue Jan 06, 2009 at 04:14pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
Read 4-36-2a defintion of Point of Interruption
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
I did, it says "A throw in to the team that was in control at a spot nearest to where the ball was located when the interuption occured".
Which team is that during a throw in? |
|
|||
Quote:
4-36-2b pardon me
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
I agree if the original throw in was an AP throw in. The original AP throw in had not completed.
|
|
|||
It's not a battle. Its a civil discussion. And I could be wrong. Which case plays? I'll be more than happy to read them.
|
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Say A1 shoots & before it's successful we have a double foul, no t/c but we wont go to the arrow, Team A scored so Team B is entitled to such. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|