![]() |
|
|||
In this case scenario
A1 was down by five, they had just scored a basket which put them down by 3 and since they had no timeouts left, A3 picks up the ball clock shows 3.9 seconds and gives it the ole heave across the entire length of the court- the spirited discussion at our meeting was how to handle it and if as an association we could be consistent on the call in a delay under 5 seconds.
The rule was reviewed and further discussed. Some of the discussion centered around intent... in the OP the tactic was unsportsmanlike and therefore given the t. If it would have been a gentle tap to get the ball away from B - it could have been ignored. The coach clearly felt & made it known to the officials that it should have only been a warning. A letter was sent to the AD based on the actions of the coach to the officials as they left the court. The coach responded with appreciation for pointing out the rule, but then also went on to say that he has used this "tactic" for years with no penalty, of course this was a non league game and that team was visiting for a holiday tournament. With under 5 seconds to go, the rule is clear that the delay tactic can be ignored or penalized with a T with no warning. Whats interesting is the very same arguements brought up in the meeting have all been made here as well. Why can't the HS just adopt the collegiate rule and stop the clock after every made shot under 59.9. It would certainly close this supposed loophole. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Twenty technicals in one game - all for delay of game! | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 14 | Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:55pm |
Delay of Game | chayce | Basketball | 5 | Tue Jan 10, 2006 01:25am |
Delay of Game | Redneck Ref | Basketball | 7 | Wed Mar 24, 2004 02:02am |
Intentional delay without warning | bkiledad | Basketball | 13 | Fri Jan 31, 2003 04:28pm |
Intentional delay of game | David Emerling | Softball | 12 | Sun Aug 11, 2002 02:52pm |