The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 27, 2000, 10:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2
Wink

A1 EITHER PASSES HIGH (OFF DRIBBLE) OR SHOOTS HIGH. BALL HITS BACK BOARD (NO RIM), COMING BACK TO HIM WITHOUT HITTING FLOOR. A1 CONTINUES DRIBBLE AND PUTS IN A LAYUP. I CALLED DOUBLE DRIBBLE. ISN'T THE BACKBOARD PART OF THE FLOOR???
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 27, 2000, 11:02pm
BK BK is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 95
Send a message via Yahoo to BK
Post

I don't have my rule book in front of me, but I believe that the shot attempt ends the dribble. That would be a hard one to sell!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 27, 2000, 11:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
Post

This seems to fall into the same category as rebounding your own airball, only less controversial. If the referee determines that it was a legitimate shot attempt, it should not be a double dribble. If it appears to be a pass off the backboard gone awry, it is a double dribble. The interpretation of what the player was doing should be the key in this situation.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2000, 09:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Post

quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach on 02-27-2000 10:16 PM
This seems to fall into the same category as rebounding your own airball, only less controversial. If the referee determines that it was a legitimate shot attempt, it should not be a double dribble. If it appears to be a pass off the backboard gone awry, it is a double dribble. The interpretation of what the player was doing should be the key in this situation.


It would seem that way, but it's not true. The ball contacting the backboard is the same as hitting the floor, except that hiotting your own backboard is *not* the start of a dribble. So, in this case, no violation, no judgment needed.

See case 4.15.4C, especially part (c).

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Feb 28, 2000, 10:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 136
Post

I agree with Jenkins. According to rule book it is only a violation if you dribble, then throw it off the opponents backboard (obviously when you are in backcourt), then catch it and dribble it again. In the situation you described there is no violation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1