The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 29, 2008, 03:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 13
Question Nfhs 4-40-7

Can someone describe the situation mentioned here where there is "severe" contact on a screen but it is uncalled b/c incidental? secondly, i can't imagine letting it go without having one mad coach.

A player who is screened within the visual field is expected to avoid contact by going around the screener. In cases of screens outside the visual field, the opponent may make inadvertent contact with the screener and if the opponent is running rapidly, the contact may be severe. Such a case is to be ruled as incidental contact proved the opponent stops or attempts to stop on contact and moves around the screen, and provided the screener is not displaced if he has the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 29, 2008, 03:45pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
The wording pretty well describes the situation. A blind screen in which the screened player tries to stop upon contact. The screener can be knocked down pretty hard and it shouldn't be a foul.

"Coach, it was a blind screen. He tried to stop, and that's all the rules require."

If they don't like it, they'll stop setting blind screens.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 29, 2008, 03:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Or the screened player could get crushed by a completely legal screen from a much bigger player and maybe even injured because he never saw the screen and his teammates didn't tell him about it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 29, 2008, 05:12pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by cubsfanllw View Post
Can someone describe the situation mentioned here where there is "severe" contact on a screen but it is uncalled b/c incidental? secondly, i can't imagine letting it go without having one mad coach.

A player who is screened within the visual field is expected to avoid contact by going around the screener. In cases of screens outside the visual field, the opponent may make inadvertent contact with the screener and if the opponent is running rapidly, the contact may be severe. Such a case is to be ruled as incidental contact proved the opponent stops or attempts to stop on contact and moves around the screen, and provided the screener is not displaced if he has the ball.

ubsfanllw:

Assuming the the player setting the blind has met the requirments for setting a blind screen it means that the moving player being screened is to stop instantly upon making contact with the player setting the blind screen. If the player being screened goes through the screener the contact is a foul by the screened player.

MTD, Sr.


P.S. The Law of Conservation of Momentum governs in this play and I have yet to see a screened player who is running at top speed stop instantly upon coming into contact with the player who was setting the blind screen because the contact between the two players was not a completely (100%) elastic collision; in fact it is almost always a completely inelastic collision.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 29, 2008, 05:18pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. View Post
ubsfanllw:

Assuming the the player setting the blind has met the requirments for setting a blind screen it means that the moving player being screened is to stop instantly upon making contact with the player setting the blind screen. If the player being screened goes through the screener the contact is a foul by the screened player.
I'll go ahead and pick the nit.

He is not required to stop; he is required to "attempt to stop." There's a big difference.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 29, 2008, 05:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
I'll go ahead and pick the nit.

He is not required to stop; he is required to "attempt to stop." There's a big difference.
He's also allowed to displace the screener in this case of a blind screen without committing a foul as long as the screener does not have the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 29, 2008, 06:22pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
He's also allowed to displace the screener in this case of a blind screen without committing a foul as long as the screener does not have the ball.

NevadaRef:

I agree with you 100% that the moving player (screened player) can displace the stationary player (stationary screener); that will happen in a completely elastic collision: The momentum between the two players will be conserved with the screener moving off at the velocity of the screened player had before the collision and the screened player will stop instantly upon contact.

But collisions between human bodies are rarely 100% elastic. Therefore, if the moving player does not stop on contact, i.e., he continues on throught the screener the screened player has committed a foul.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nfhs 66, 79, 85 brianalinhart Basketball 16 Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:53pm
OBR 7.07 vs NFHS 8-3-1c Peruvian Baseball 9 Tue Jan 04, 2005 01:12am
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) KWH Football 27 Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am
NFHS POE #3 BktBallRef Basketball 19 Fri Jun 28, 2002 12:10am
NFHS on the Net Paul LeBoutillier Basketball 3 Thu Dec 28, 2000 12:01am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1