60 Seconds: Team Control

[Adam]

Does this come from your state?

Ouch!

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Does this come from your state?

Ouch!

No, this is the email from someone that sends these things out every week or so. I think they come from IAABO, but I am not sure.

Peace

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Does this come from your state?

Ouch!

No, it's from 60 Seconds on Officiating (60 Seconds on Officiating)

[Adam]

Looks like they've fixed they're error by removing the offending phrase.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Looks like they've fixed they're error by removing the offending phrase.

They have... what I posted was in the e-mail they sent out this morning. I'm going to guess they got several e-mails stating the same point I was making.

[zm1283]

The only three ways for team control to end are:

1. Try for goal
2. Ball becomes dead
3. Other team gains control

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by zm1283

The only three ways for team control to end are:

1. Try/tap for goal
2. Ball becomes dead
3. Other team gains control

Exactly my point...

[refnrev]

[QUOTE=Snaqwells;559431]Does this come from your state?

Members of our association get them in a e-mail.

[BillyMac]

I just subscribed a few days ago. Today's email seemed educational. Is it worth it, time wise, it's free, for me to continue my subscription? Between me on the Forum, and my twin brother, Billy Mac (note space), on the NFHS forum, we both already spend a lot of time on the computer. Is 60 Seconds worth it?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

I just subscribed a few days ago. Today's email seemed educational. Is it worth it, time wise, it's free, for me to continue my subscription? Between me on the Forum, and my twin brother, Billy Mac (note space), on the NFHS forum, we both already spend a lot of time on the computer. Is 60 Seconds worth it?

I did not do anything and I received this email. I am not sure it is worth it, but I keep getting the emails.

Peace

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I did not do anything and I received this email. I am not sure it is worth it, but I keep getting the emails.

I hope that there's a way to opt out if I decide to. I never thought of that when I signed up. I guess that I can always use my SPAM filter if I have to.

[Kelvin green]

The interestig thing...

If you look at the rules (4-15-6) Player control foul cannot be committed during an interrupted dribble...

So a couple of yeras ago if a interrupted driblle occurred and ball went loose it was a common foul.... Once we inserted team control, there is no PC but still team control...

This is my personal commentary..I think we now call fouls as TC that may have not been intended by the rules.

The play that I hate is that you have A1 dribbling the ball, B1 knocks ball away and both are diving for ball and A1 now pushes B1 to get at ball... I know it is a TC foul and will call it that way but personally it should (for lack of a better term) some sort of loose ball foul....

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Kelvin green

This is my personal commentary..I think we now call fouls as TC that may have not been intended by the rules.

TC fouls in these situations are explicitly intended by the rules. Case play 4.19.7 SITUATION B.

I know it is a TC foul and will call it that way but personally it should (for lack of a better term) some sort of loose ball foul....

Only in the NBA. There's team control, so why shouldn't it be a team control foul. If you are saying that you think team control should be ended on a defensive bat, I can see the point in that, but I don't see the need to change it. I don't think it improves the game to shoot free throws in that situation.