The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 26, 2008, 10:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by refnrev View Post
Hey M&M,
Don't you think that we also pray that Tanner gets some more officiating equipment, especially whistles for Christmas this year?
Yea, Tanner needs more equipment like Congress needs more companies in line for bailout requests.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 26, 2008, 12:38pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by refnrev View Post
Hey M&M,
Don't you think that we also pray that Tanner gets some more officiating equipment, especially whistles for Christmas this year?
I think that's a good prayer. I haven't got anything in like two weeks. I think that should count! Also, I think I'm holding out on anymore whistles. I'm pretty sure I'm covered (and others are too).

Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M Guy View Post
Yea, Tanner needs more equipment like Congress needs more companies in line for bailout requests.
I've heard they are working on a package to bail me out of all the shipping costs I've had.

In return, I am pushing for them to approve the panel shirts in Illinois.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 26, 2008, 01:53pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by refnrev View Post
Here's the deal. Anyone that's worried about socks is worried TOO much and is "majoring in the minors." There is nothing in the rules on socks and you look like a dufus when you make it an issue.
While I agree with this, I can also see the possibility of a newer official, who knows that uniforms are a constant POE, might not realize that socks aren't part of the uniform. The rules committee has focused so much on fashion issues in the last 5 or 6 years that it's not unreasonable for someone who isn't really sure to think that socks ought to match.

Obviously, the official needs to learn the actual rule, but with all the fashion POEs recently, would it really surprise anybody if this became a rule?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 26, 2008, 02:12pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
Obviously, the official needs to learn the actual rule, but with all the fashion POEs recently, would it really surprise anybody if this became a rule?
Not me. In fact, I'll bet it's on this year's NFHS survey.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 26, 2008, 09:48pm
(Something hilarious)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: These United States
Posts: 1,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
Do restrictions on manufacturing logos apply to socks?
Apparently, they do in the WCC (W) as of two weeks ago. A matter of time for NFHS? Good lord I hope not.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quick Uniform Question bossman72 Baseball 29 Fri Apr 25, 2008 08:12pm
Uniform/Apparel Question FishinRef Basketball 13 Thu Dec 28, 2006 02:26am
NFHS Uniform Question Andy Softball 1 Thu Apr 13, 2006 03:59pm
Uniform Question coach41 Basketball 6 Sun Jul 11, 2004 09:36pm
Uniform question . . . JHut17 Basketball 3 Wed Dec 04, 2002 04:29pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1