Wrong ruling even back then! - The Official Forum

#3 (permalink)

Fri Nov 14, 2008, 02:23am

Back In The Saddle Back In The Saddle is offline

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Jan 2003

Location: In a little pink house

Posts: 5,289

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref

Pardon my ignorance. What's wrong with it?

A foul committed against an airborne shooter is not ignored just because the ball is dead.

NFHS 4-19-1 NOTE: Contact after the ball has become dead is ignored unless it is ruled intentional or flagrant or is committed by or on an airborne shooter.

Given that, why is the foul against the airborne shooter ignored in this case?

__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming

Last edited by Back In The Saddle; Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 02:26am.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Wrong Way! Wrong Goal?	Rick Durkee	Basketball	6	Mon Nov 05, 2007 05:57pm
When I'm Wrong, I'm wrong: Interference is better without intent	wadeintothem	Softball	48	Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:58am
FED DH Ruling	largeone59	Baseball	8	Tue Aug 02, 2005 05:47am
Ruling?	Scotto	Baseball	4	Fri Nov 14, 2003 07:16pm
New Video Clip: touch back or not . NF ruling	sm_bbcoach	Football	9	Thu Aug 28, 2003 08:16am

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38pm.