FT situation

[OHBBREF]

Player A1 is shooting two free throws for a direct technical foul assessed to
B1. Right after the official hands the ball to A1, A2 flagrantly pushes B2. The official calls a flagrant foul on A2 and ejects him/her. The officials have no players lined up for A1's two free throws or for B2's two free throws and after B2 shoots, the officials award the ball to team B for a throw-in nearest to where the foul occurred Are the officials correct?

use both FED and NCAA

[Bad Zebra]

Originally Posted by OHBBREF

Player A1 is shooting two free throws for a direct technical foul assessed to
B1. Right after the official hands the ball to A1, A2 flagrantly pushes B2. The official calls a flagrant foul on A2 and ejects him/her. The officials have no players lined up for A1's two free throws or for B2's two free throws and after B2 shoots, the officials award the ball to team B for a throw-in nearest to where the foul occurred Are the officials correct?

use both FED and NCAA

My thinking: (Fed) As the foul on A2 occured during a dead ball, it would by rule be a flagrant technical foul. Therefore the officials are incorrect in that the Team B throw in should occur at the division line opposite table.

[eg-italy]

Originally Posted by Bad Zebra

My thinking: (Fed) As the foul on A2 occured during a dead ball, it would by rule be a flagrant technical foul. Therefore the officials are incorrect in that the Team B throw in should occur at the division line opposite table.

I don't think that the ball is dead after it has been handed to the free thrower.

Ciao

[Bad Zebra]

Originally Posted by eg-italy

I don't think that the ball is dead after it has been handed to the free thrower.

Ciao

Good point. That would then have a material affect on the throw in location.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Bad Zebra

Good point. That would then have a material affect on the throw in location.

It would also affect who may shoot B's free throws.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by OHBBREF

Player A1 is shooting two free throws for a direct technical foul assessed to
B1. Right after the official hands the ball to A1, A2 flagrantly pushes B2. The official calls a flagrant foul on A2 and ejects him/her. The officials have no players lined up for A1's two free throws or for B2's two free throws and after B2 shoots, the officials award the ball to team B for a throw-in nearest to where the foul occurred Are the officials correct?

use both FED and NCAA

NFHS: The officials are correct.
NCAA-M: The officials are correct.
NCAA-W: I need to check.

PS Could Juulie please give a lesson on the proper usage of and difference between affect and effect?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

NFHS: The officials are correct.
NCAA-M: The officials are correct.
NCAA-W: I need to check.

NCAAW: Same as NCAAM

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

NFHS: The officials are correct.
NCAA-M: The officials are correct.
NCAA-W: I need to check.

PS Could Juulie please give a lesson on the proper usage of and difference between affect and effect?

I can help.

Affect is a verb.
Effect is a noun.

Thus endeth today's grammar lesson.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I can help.

Affect is a verb.
Effect is a noun.

Thus endeth today's grammar lesson.

Nope, both can be used as either a noun or a verb.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Nope, both can be used as either a noun or a verb.

Found here.

usage Effect and affect are often confused because of their similar spelling and pronunciation. The verb 2affect usually has to do with pretense . The more common 3affect denotes having an effect or influence . The verb effect goes beyond mere influence; it refers to actual achievement of a final result . The uncommon noun affect, which has a meaning relating to psychology, is also sometimes mistakenly used for the very common effect. In ordinary use, the noun you will want is effect .

So for the purposes of this discussion, my statement was correct, even though it left the uncommon usages out.