Hack-A-Shaq

[Adam]

Originally Posted by CosaNostra4Life

Fouling off ball to gain an advantage is just ridiculous and this rule need to be changed.

What do you suggest, oh great one?

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

What do you suggest, oh great one?

Probably have Gino and Alphonse take him out behind the wood shed.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

What do you suggest, oh great one?

Others have previously suggested granting the fouled team the choice between the FTs or possession (and a new shot clock to go with it).

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Others have previously suggested granting the fouled team the choice between the FTs or possession (and a new shot clock to go with it).

Camron - I think that would be a fair arrangement. Here's something else to consider, however it's sort of convoluted. If an "off the ball" foul occurs, any player on the team that was fouled (who is on the floor) can shoot the free throws. If there's an 85% shooter on the floor, there's really no point in fouling off the ball against a 52% shooter.

I think Rick Barry would have loved this one.

[CosaNostra4Life]

I suggest if they do this then the team gets to choose who shoots the free throw.


Geeez I didnt think my screen-name would be a big deal. I grew up around all that stuff. Sorry fellas.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by CosaNostra4Life

Geeez I didnt think my screen-name would be a big deal. I grew up around all that stuff. Sorry fellas.

Really? Where did you grow up, Sicily?

[CosaNostra4Life]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Really? Where did you grow up, Sicily?

Nope.... New York....

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by CosaNostra4Life

Geeez I didnt think my screen-name would be a big deal. I grew up around all that stuff. Sorry fellas.

I just despise criminals and their glorification.

[CosaNostra4Life]

Originally Posted by Welpe

I just despise criminals and their glorification.

Just cause I grew up around it doesnt mean I was involved!

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by CosaNostra4Life

Just cause I grew up around it doesnt mean I was involved!

Then why choose a nickname that appears to proclaim your lifelong devotion and undying support of it?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Camron - I think that would be a fair arrangement. Here's something else to consider, however it's sort of convoluted. If an "off the ball" foul occurs, any player on the team that was fouled (who is on the floor) can shoot the free throws. If there's an 85% shooter on the floor, there's really no point in fouling off the ball against a 52% shooter.

I think Rick Barry would have loved this one.

That's an excellent idea.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

If an "off the ball" foul occurs, any player on the team that was fouled (who is on the floor) can shoot the free throws.

I believe that this is actually the rule on an "away from the play" foul, although the rule only kicks in during the last two minutes of the 4th quarter or OT, as was pointed out earlier.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

I believe that this is actually the rule on an "away from the play" foul, although the rule only kicks in during the last two minutes of the 4th quarter or OT, as was pointed out earlier.

Actually, I believe that the rule is one FT by any player and retention of the ball.

So the question would be is two FTs by any player, but no awarding of possession better or worse?

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Actually, I believe that the rule is one FT by any player and retention of the ball.

Yes, but I was only addressing the part of Mark's post that suggeted letting any player on the floor shoot the free throws. Sorry for the confusion.