The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2003, 09:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
They're kidding me, right? Ugh.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2003, 09:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Gotta be a mistake. Surely they changed the call!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 07:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Care to enlighten those of us who couldn't stay awake to see the Lakers game? It's just as well that I went to sleep and missed the end of the Celtics game. Yeesh!
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 07:42am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Care to enlighten those of us who couldn't stay awake to see the Lakers game?
They called a "charge" on Shaq.Slappy was amazed 'cause the big guy is usually allowed to run over people in the paint.I think that it's in the NBA rulebook somewhere that he's allowed to do that,so I was kinda surprised too.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 09:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
I was very surprised that Shaq got a charge on that play, in terms of contact & the defender's positioning it seemed weak to me at best, at least from my seat 15 ft from my TV.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 10:30am
Joe Joe is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
I was very surprised that Shaq got a charge on that play, in terms of contact & the defender's positioning it seemed weak to me at best, at least from my seat 15 ft from my TV.
The defender's feet were set. He was outside the arc. Shaq
ran right over him and put him flat on his back....

"I was very surprised that Shaq got a charge on that play.."

Me too! Shaq is allowed to do that 99% of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 10:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
I was very surprised that Shaq got a charge on that play, in terms of contact & the defender's positioning it seemed weak to me at best, at least from my seat 15 ft from my TV.
The defender's feet were set. He was outside the arc. Shaq
ran right over him and put him flat on his back....

"I was very surprised that Shaq got a charge on that play.."

Me too! Shaq is allowed to do that 99% of the time.
Shaq is allowed 10X that 99% of the time!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 10:53am
Joe Joe is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 62


"I was very surprised that Shaq got a charge on that play.."

Me too! Shaq is allowed to do that 99% of the time. [/B][/QUOTE]

Shaq is allowed 10X that 99% of the time! [/B][/QUOTE]


"Shaq is the hardest player in history to officiate."

Translation: "If we called half of everything on Shaq he'd never play past the first half, and we'd lose the biggest draw in the game."
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe


"I was very surprised that Shaq got a charge on that play.."

Me too! Shaq is allowed to do that 99% of the time.
Shaq is allowed 10X that 99% of the time! [/B][/QUOTE]


"Shaq is the hardest player in history to officiate."

Translation: "If we called half of everything on Shaq he'd never play past the first half, and we'd lose the biggest draw in the game." [/B][/QUOTE]

I will agree that Shaq gets away with alot (as do many other centers and other stars in the NBA). I would also argue that it goes both ways with Shaq, to be perfectly fair. He is so large that, in order to contain him, many teams use a lot of what would be blatantly illegal contact against anybody else and don't get called for it using it against Shaq.

I don't envy anybody trying to officiate when there is a player of that extraordinary size on the court.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 11:18am
Joe Joe is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 62
"I would also argue that it goes both ways with Shaq, to be perfectly fair."

I agree, but I'd say Shaq leads the NBA in elbows/shoulders/forearms to the face of a defender
and no call, OR (and this happens a lot with Shaq) the
defender is called for hitting Shaq's elbow
with their face ;-(.... OUCH!


"I don't envy anybody trying to officiate when there is a player of that extraordinary size on the court."

Point taken.


Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe


"I was very surprised that Shaq got a charge on that play.."

Me too! Shaq is allowed to do that 99% of the time.
Shaq is allowed 10X that 99% of the time!

"Shaq is the hardest player in history to officiate."

Translation: "If we called half of everything on Shaq he'd never play past the first half, and we'd lose the biggest draw in the game." [/B][/QUOTE]

I will agree that Shaq gets away with alot (as do many other centers and other stars in the NBA). I would also argue that it goes both ways with Shaq, to be perfectly fair. He is so large that, in order to contain him, many teams use a lot of what would be blatantly illegal contact against anybody else and don't get called for it using it against Shaq.

I don't envy anybody trying to officiate when there is a player of that extraordinary size on the court. [/B][/QUOTE]
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 11:18am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by Hawks Coach


I don't envy anybody trying to officiate when there is a player of that extraordinary size on the court. [/B]
The problem is that they officiate to the "player" and not the "play" in the NBA. It's the same as Patrick Ewing taking his 4/5 steps every time he came across the key,Reggie Miller not knowing or caring what a pivot foot is,or Alan Iverson palming the ball on every dribble-etc.,etc.,etc. Entertainment,not rules,rulz!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 11:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe
The defender's feet were set. He was outside the arc.
Both of these points are irrelevant. You don't have to have your feet set to take a charge. And in the NBA, the primary defender (Shaq's man) can be on or inside the arc and be fouled. It's the secondary defender (the help defender) that must be outside the arc.
__________________
Things turn out best for people who make the best of the way things turn out.
-- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 11:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
Thumbs up Great points

PA Coach - You are comletely correct on both points regarding the PC foul rule.

JR - I will concede that an element of entertainment enters into the officiating in the NBA (i.e., they don't want to blow a violation every time down the court, they don't want to oful out the stars if possible). However, I think that oversimplifies the problem of officiating play involving players of Shaq's size.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 11:39am
Joe Joe is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally posted by A Pennsylvania Coach
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe
The defender's feet were set. He was outside the arc.
Both of these points are irrelevant. You don't have to have your feet set to take a charge. And in the NBA, the primary defender (Shaq's man) can be on or inside the arc and be fouled. It's the secondary defender (the help defender) that must be outside the arc.
I know your feet don't *have* to be set, but they were anyway...and it was the secondary defender on this play.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2003, 11:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
With a secondary defender, the arc is defintely relevant and the feet almost always will need to be set. It is hard to imagine circumstances where the secondary defender can draw a PC foul without getting set in the offensive player's line of movement first. Feet moving on a PC is something that occurs when you are on the ball, not off the ball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1