The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 17, 2008, 03:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Richmond, IN
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by rainmaker
What's preposterous is this much arguing about two tenths of a second. Two tenths. Not two seconds. I don't know what the threshold is, but it's sure greater than two tenths of a second. In the OP the time told the refs AFTER the shots were taken that she had seen two tenths. I'm doubting that. And the game is over. No rules basis to do anything else.
What if it was .3, .4, .5, .6....What's the number we should use to make the determination? I think thats the argument. You say that you know that its greater then .2 and I would have to agree, but how do we know?

The book gives us a definite time to use on throw-in's with .3 or less to make a determination if it has to be tapped or if it can be caught. So if were not to be able to add time then why not give a definite time to use to determine if there is a mistake?

The book doesn't no longer give us a benchmark time to use to distinguish if there was a timing error. Since its no longer there then observed time can be put back on by rule since the official would have to determine that it was a timing error.

What if while the clock was running the HC calls a T/O, you blow your whistle while looking @ the clock, and notice @ your whistle there was 1 second but it stopped @ .2,.3, .4, or.5.. Are you going to adjust the time? What if the coach sees that more time runs off after your whistle?

Like I said way down the line that I think an argument could be made the the book would support either ruling on the OP play.
__________________
It is what it is!!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 17, 2008, 03:45pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Reaction Time Statistics:

Here are some interesting statistics from the Reaction Time database.
These change in real time, as more people take the test.

The average (median) reaction time is 215 milliseconds.

Could this be used to say that there was no obvious mistake in the OP?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 17, 2008, 03:53pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,392
System Internationale ....

Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
The average (median) reaction time is 215 milliseconds.
For those metrically challanged Forum members, I believe that's 0.215 seconds.



Also: I forget, how many bushels in a peck?

Last edited by BillyMac; Sun Feb 17, 2008 at 05:12pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Refresher Test Questions - putting time back on the clock? rfp Basketball 14 Wed Nov 07, 2007 04:24pm
Putting time back on the clock drs Football 16 Thu Nov 01, 2007 08:54am
A mandated do-over; putting consumed time back on the clock Back In The Saddle Basketball 4 Wed Jul 18, 2007 02:45pm
Time Back on Clock golfdesigner Basketball 10 Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:34am
Put time back on the clock? RecRef Basketball 23 Wed Jan 09, 2002 07:59am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1