Nova vs Georgetown

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

In my mind, the author of the story was just another pretentious prick. His preamble was ample proof of that. Hopefully, he'll grow out of it. Being a Dookie though, the odds are against it.

JB, don't pay the old fossil any mind. Back in the 1500s none of the commoners went to university, he's just frustrated he could only read 20% of the words. I wouldn't expect JR to keep up with a university-educated writer.

There, there. (pats little JR on the head)

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by fiasco

JB, don't pay the old fossil any mind. Back in the 1500s none of the commoners went to university, he's just frustrated he could only read 20% of the words. I wouldn't expect JR to keep up with a university-educated writer.

There, there. (pats little JR on the head)

Aw geeze, another Dookie (or Dookie wannabe) shows up.

We should have a rule here. Only one Dookie allowed per forum.

[jbduke]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Aw geeze, another Dookie (or Dookie wannabe) shows up.

We should have a rule here. Only one Dookie allowed per forum.

Right after we institute the one that reads only one cantankerous, parochial old fart per forum.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by jbduke

Right after we institute the one that reads only one cantankerous, parochial old fart per forum.

Who else posts here that fits that description to a T other than moi?

I'm safe.

[socalreff]

Originally Posted by jcarter

Real simple, the official had two choices.

1. Call the foul
2. Call out of bounds

no way you can let both of those go. He did the rite thing!

If the foul is not called, would the clock have run out before the out of bounds?
Just wondering....
And I'm not saying anything about judgment on the play.

[HawkeyeCubP]

Originally Posted by socalreff

If the foul is not called, would the clock have run out before the out of bounds?
Just wondering....
And I'm not saying anything about judgment on the play.

No. The player's foot stepping out of bounds happened just before the whistle was blown, so there's no way time would have expired.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

Okay, perhaps it's because it's near the end of the season, and maybe I anticipated a troll and made the wrong call?

That's why you need to work on a patient whistle.

[socalreff]

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP

No. The player's foot stepping out of bounds happened just before the whistle was blown, so there's no way time would have expired.

However, if you have a patient whistle on the play, and the whistle blows after the horn for an out of bounds call, by rule I don't think that's reviewable or correctable.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by socalreff

However, if you have a patient whistle on the play, and the whistle blows after the horn for an out of bounds call, by rule I don't think that's reviewable or correctable.

Maybe, but can you really say you're that aware of the clock that you know it's about to run out?