The philosophy of awarding two shoots

[BktBallRef]

...and has I said, there's no rule support for doing such. Therefore, I don't think you're going to get any other reply.

Personally, I've never seen anyone do it.

[zebraman]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

...and has I said, there's no rule support for doing such. Therefore, I don't think you're going to get any other reply.

Personally, I've never seen anyone do it.

I saw it once. A1 was in the act of shooting and got pushed. The push caused A1 to take about 4 quick stutter-steps and then A1 threw up the ball and it went in. The referee disallowed the basket because of the illegal footwork and awarded 2 shots. Good call.

[BktBallRef]

There was no basket to disallow, Z.

Besides that, I don't believe that's the type of situation the rookie is talking about. But who knows? It doesn't make much sense.

[zebraman]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

There was no basket to disallow, Z.

Besides that, I don't believe that's the type of situation the rookie is talking about. But who knows? It doesn't make much sense.

I know, but I thought it was an interesting (and correct) scenario that I had never seen before.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by truerookie

How is this a good call? The player is in the act of shooting and get fouled while in the act.

So what if a player is in the act of shooting, does not release the ball comes back to the floor and then jumps up again and puts the ball in the hole? Are you going to award the basket?

Peace

[truerookie]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

So what if a player is in the act of shooting, does not release the ball comes back to the floor and then jumps up again and puts the ball in the hole? Are you going to award the basket?

Peace

No! The point I attempted to make is. If player is in the act of shooting and is fouled he/she is allowed to continue the habitual throwing; pivoting or stepping movement while still holding the ball

[Adam]

If they disallow the basket, there are only three scenarios which would allow two shots to the fouled player.

1. Double bonus situation.
2. Shooter traveled (or other violation) prior to releasing the shot, but after the foul).
3. The foul happened just as the period expired, but the period expired prior to the release of the shot (and the officials did not see time on the clock after the whistle).

4. Intentional foul (I added this one even though it doesn't seem like that was the case given your confusion).

Are you sure they weren't in the double bonus (the most likely scenario)?

You noticed a trend? I've never seen a single official make this mistake, so I can't imagine a "trend."