In the Act of Shooting?

[jdw3018]

Originally Posted by PSidbury

Is it a travel ?

I was just going to post the same thing. Travel and go get a beer...

[kbilla]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

I was just going to post the same thing. Travel and go get a beer...

Yep sure was, didn't even look for this first time around...maybe that is how they justified the two shots, they sped up the timing of the contact to where it happened before the travel and therefore before the try started

[JugglingReferee]

I see the travel before the try.

I see a shooting foul if no travel was called.

[Johnny Ringo]

For sure it was a shooting foul ... however, the travel came first!

[grunewar]

You think it was controversial the refs calling this a non-shooting foul.....can you imagine if they would have called the travel?

[Johnny Ringo]

Get the call right!

[tjones1]

Whoa nelly! I've got a travel.

Either way, that defensive player would be doing a little running the following day for being the bone-head of the game.

[kbilla]

Originally Posted by grunewar

You think it was controversial the refs calling this a non-shooting foul.....can you imagine if they would have called the travel?

I actually think a travel would be the LEAST controversial call they could have made! Travel occurred prior to any contact and prior to the start of any try...nothing after the travel matters....it might have been controversial for two seconds after until they showed the replay, but there wouldn't be a bunch of officials debating it on a chat board the next day