Thu Dec 06, 2007, 10:45am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Sure there is. From the definition of an intentional foul, it's contact when not making a legitimate attempt to play the ball or player. Whointhehell would ever make a legitimate attempt to play the FT shooter? You can make a case for forfeiture also, language-wise, by using rule 5-4-1 if a team decided that it would be fun and giggles to pull this crap more than once. Just call it a travesty of the game.
The idea imo is to nail 'em with the most severe penalty that you can think of, so that they will have to think about it before pulling crap like that again.
Of course, being a law'n'order kinda guy, I have to admit that I also think that flogging should be part of the technical foul penalty too.
|
Fair enough. And I agree about the flogging, especially for coaches 
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
|
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
