FT administration sequence

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by ILRef80

The thing that throws me off is the bonus situation. If B was in the double bonus, then it's very simple.

While I agree with the other answers (even JRuts, given that he misread who fouled and who was fouled), I'm curious as to why this was "easy" for you if it was a "double bonus" [sic] and not easy in the bonus situation.

[ILRef80]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

While I agree with the other answers (even JRuts, given that he misread who fouled and who was fouled), I'm curious as to why this was "easy" for you if it was a "double bonus" [sic] and not easy in the bonus situation.

Like Snaqwells said, I was overthinking it.

If it's double bonus - then it's just the same as if a tech occurs after a shooting foul. It was the 1 and 1 bonus situation that was throwing me a bit. Just overthinking it. This situation hasn't come up in any of my games the past couple of years (this is my 2nd year), I just wondered about it the other night and had some doubt so I came here to clear that up.

[mbyron]

Some folks might think of the 1-and-1 as being defined by having play begin after a missed first FT. So if the lane is cleared and that couldn't happen, it would seem that you couldn't have a 1-and-1.

What defines the 1-and-1 is getting a bonus shot for making the first. Nothing requires play to begin immediately after a missed first FT, and in some cases (like the OP) it doesn't.