Case Book 9-9-1 Sit. D

[truerookie]

Originally Posted by RushmoreRef

Struckoff's answer last year was it was "not" a violation....Does the new rule now make it a violation on B2 as well or is the defense given special consideration as in rule 9-9-3 or since the throw-in is now over on the "legal touch" is it a violation?

Looking at the text, I would say that it also applies to B2 since the only exception is granted to the player who initially touch the ball.

Violation!

[RushmoreRef]

Originally Posted by truerookie

Looking at the text, I would say that it also applies to B2 since the only exception is granted to the player who initially touch the ball.

Violation!

That's what I think as well and hope is the consensus...I do remember this being a long, drawn-out topic last year and maybe the new "end of throw-in rule" will clear this up.

It is nice to see that they acted on it at the Fed and took some of our concerns to heart and have appeared to address them.

[truerookie]

Originally Posted by RushmoreRef

That's what I think as well and hope is the consensus...I do remember this being a long, drawn-out topic last year and maybe the new "end of throw-in rule" will clear this up.

It is nice to see that they acted on it at the Fed and took some of our concerns to heart and have appeared to address them.

Agreed