The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 22, 2007, 05:34pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Padgett
JR - I think his point was the use of the word "and" in the rule. Using it implies you could have a foul in which an opponent is intentionally or flagrantly contacted when the ball is dead and have it be a personal foul. If that wasn't the case, there would be no need grammatically to use the phrase "and such contact is not a personal foul".

It wasn't a situation in which he didn't know the rule, it was that he thought the rulebook was self-confusing.

OK, I know "self-confusing" isn't a real word but maybe it will grow up to be one someday.
Mark, the poster said "I thought that any dead ball foul could NOT be a personal foul, by definition..." Well, by the definition that I cited, he thought wrong. That was my point. Contact on or by an airborne shooter after the ball is dead can be a personal foul.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rule 4 under definitions of act of shooting DentalCoug Basketball 10 Sat Jan 21, 2006 08:58pm
UTAH foul chart Nevadaref Basketball 3 Sat Dec 18, 2004 05:42am
Understanding Force mikesears Football 25 Thu Jul 10, 2003 01:54am
Stopping the never-ending flow of subs mikesears Basketball 7 Thu Dec 28, 2000 10:34am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1