The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2007, 07:56pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTTB
I'm responding to the new POE. And I'm only responding to the officials in the PAC 10 Conference, which is the only conference with which I have direct experience. And I have a LOT of experience with that conference...

The new rule must not have much to do with our league. The coaches and assistants in the PAC 10 do not incite the crowd, and do not get many technicals. I don't think I've seen more than 2 or 3 technchal fouls called on the bench in the last 10 seasons. That guess might be too high.
Please note that BTTB is a fanboy and not an official. He has no direct knowledge at all about PAC10 officiating, or any kind of officiating for that matter. He also has zip, nada, NO experience at all when it comes to anything related to officiating. Saying that PAC10 coaches don't incite the crowd or get many technicals is patently ridiculous. If you say differently, fanboy, post some statistics that will back up your claim.

Take anything that BTTB says as coming from a fanboy who obviously has an axe to grind with PAC10 officials.

Geeze, fanboy, why not wait until the season starts before you start your whining? Your team hasn't lost a game yet.

Btw, I got rid of your stoopid color scheme too, fanboy.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2007, 08:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
Quote:
Saying that PAC10 coaches don't incite the crowd or get many technicals is patently ridiculous.
Name three. I dare you. I suspect you are wrong, simply because you don't know.

BTW, I meant it as a mutual compliment to both PAC benches and the PAC 10 referees that they DON'T call may bench technicals. They shouldn't, because almost none are warrented. It doesn't happen.

But, old one, if you insist, name me three. PAC 10, last ten seasons.


BTTB
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2007, 08:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
I'm waiting old guy. 15,000 posts, and no answer to my simple request? Maybe you say more than you know... Just give me three. BTW, I thought that might be too high.

BTTB
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2007, 08:42pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTTB
I'm waiting old guy. 15,000 posts, and no answer to my simple request? Maybe you say more than you know... Just give me three. BTW, I thought that might be too high.
Naw, I don't play with fanboys. Waste of time.

Y'all just keep on a-whining and a-moaning about the mean ol' PAC10 officials. Try doing that on a fanboy site though. It might get received a little better. This site is for officials....and grown-ups.

Now, piss off. Shoo, shoo......
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2007, 08:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
Didn't think so. All air, no mud. BTW, I'm right, you're wrong.

Sincerely, your fanboy,


BTTB
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 12, 2007, 08:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTTB
Didn't think so. All air, no mud. BTW, I'm right, you're wrong.

Sincerely, your fanboy,
Good comeback, Potsie...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 13, 2007, 07:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTTB


Name three. I dare you. I suspect you are wrong, simply because you don't know.

BTW, I meant it as a mutual compliment to both PAC benches and the PAC 10 referees that they DON'T call may bench technicals. They shouldn't, because almost none are warrented. It doesn't happen.

But, old one, if you insist, name me three. PAC 10, last ten seasons.


BTTB

From last season.
1. Feb 28 Lorenzo Romar Washington
2. March 23 Tim Floyd USC (throwing papers on the floor)
3. Mar 3 Trent Johnson Stanford
4. Feb 24 Ernie Kent Oregon (chasing officials onto the floor)

A five minute Google search, not an exhaustive study.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 13, 2007, 08:04am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay R
From last season.
1. Feb 28 Lorenzo Romar Washington
2. March 23 Tim Floyd USC (throwing papers on the floor)
3. Mar 3 Trent Johnson Stanford
4. Feb 24 Ernie Kent Oregon (chasing officials onto the floor)

A five minute Google search, not an exhaustive study.
LOL!! Truth and Reality over bare idiocy every time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bench Decorum rainmaker Basketball 35 Thu Jan 11, 2007 04:12pm
How not to enforce Bench Decorum Adam Basketball 24 Fri Dec 01, 2006 06:52pm
NCAA Emphasis on palming/carrying bearclause Basketball 20 Mon Nov 27, 2006 07:41am
Bench Decorum problem? btaylor64 Basketball 7 Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:50pm
Hanging on rim, NCAA point of emphasis? bigwes68 Basketball 2 Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:28am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1