Youtube video

[canuckrefguy]

Anyway, on second look at the video....

Goofball is obviously not your prototypical basketball player.

What I see is dribbler going up the floor fast - Goofball goes to intercept him, dribbler has head down, and then goes slightly airborne to make that half-baseball pass....Goofball sees him flying through the air and, being the athlete that he is, just ducks instinctively. That, combined with the dribbler being airborne, sends dribbler flying.

Intentional, for sure.

Not so sure about flagrant.

My $0.02.

[Back In The Saddle]

Whether he's just being stoopid, uncoordinated, bit off more than he could chew, or whatever, it really doesn't matter to me. The result of his actions was very dangerous and definitely non-basketball. For the safety of everybody else on the floor (not to mention what little is left of the integrity of the game) it's time for little Johnny to leave.

[deecee]

i am not arguing the level of play or the age group -- i am simply stating we have one set of events and we have 2 seperate penalties. this isnt a case of bang-bang block/charge. and this is actually a good sample of how varying levels of judgement actually make our job so much harder.

i think it would be great if the fed came up with a video with many common type plays/contacts and had an answer like "this should be called X". that would aleviate at least 50-70% of judgement issues. but instead we get stupid rules rewritten to make even less sense.