Youtube video

[Dan_ref]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOZmpixWxiE&NR=1

Comments on the no call?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

Comments on the no call?

For the FT shooter leaving the semi-circle before the ball hit the ring/backboard?

Yup, that was a violation.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

For the FT shooter leaving the semi-circle before the ball hit the ring/backboard?

Yup, that was a violation.

And furthermore, the ball never did hit the ring, which is a violation all by itself.

But I sure wouldn't call the foul that did get called "flagrant". It was just a clueless kid who all of a sudden saw someone coming towrad him and sort of ducked to avoid getting nailed. Good call, but not flagrant.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

1) And furthermore, the ball never did hit the ring, which is a violation all by itself.

2) But I sure wouldn't call the foul that did get called "flagrant". It was just a clueless kid who all of a sudden saw someone coming towrad him and sort of ducked to avoid getting nailed. Good call, but not flagrant.

We must be watching different videos.....

1) I though that the ball just ticked the front of the ring and came straight down on the second FT. That's why they headed up-court with no throw-in.

2) Looked to me like the defender went sideways and then low-bridged the offensive player. Always a dangerous act. I'd have thought very seriously about calling that sucker flagrant.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

We must be watching different videos.....

1) I though that the ball just ticked the front of the ring and came straight down on the second FT. That's why they headed up-court with no throw-in.

I suppose it might have but the arc looks pretty pure to me.

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

2) Looked to me like the defender went sideways and then low-bridged the offensive player. Always a dangerous act. I'd have thought very seriously about calling that sucker flagrant.

I'll go back and look at it again.

[deecee]

pretty obvious that kid doesnt belong on the court.

looks flagrant to me and i wouldnt think seriously about it -- kids gone -- he should stick to whatever keeps him off any playing field/court

[SamIAm]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

We must be watching different videos.....

1) I though that the ball just ticked the front of the ring and came straight down on the second FT. That's why they headed up-court with no throw-in.

2) Looked to me like the defender went sideways and then low-bridged the offensive player. Always a dangerous act. I'd have thought very seriously about calling that sucker flagrant.

2)... I would not have thought very long about calling it flagrant. X-Flagrant!

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by SamIAm

X-Flagrant!

Not being smart but what is an "X-Flagrant"?

[lrpalmer3]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

For the FT shooter leaving the semi-circle before the ball hit the ring/backboard?

Yup, that was a violation.

OMG, the players even have their shirts untucked!!!! Why the no call?

I would simply look at the coach and tell him that this player is finished playing basketball today. No stearn looks at the player, and no flagarant is necessary. This doesn't appear to be a sanctioned game of any kind.

[JugglingReferee]

The game is better if a foul is called. Attempt to injure perhaps. Blocking below the waist belongs in a different sport, and even then only in the Close Line Play Area.

Also, why does red player # 1 have a mismatched coloured undershirt?

[SamIAm]

Comments on the no call?

How did you determine this was a "no call"?

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by SamIAm

Comments on the no call?

How did you determine this was a "no call"?

See JR's response

(sort of a trick question)

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOZmpixWxiE&NR=1

Comments on the no call?

I'm sure you mean the "no call" of letting the player wear white sleeves under a red jersey. There's absolutely no excuse for that.

[canuckrefguy]

Is it just me - or did they also allow a defensive player to stand one space too high on the lane?

[JugglingReferee]

So... there is:

• a defensive player in the wrong spot
• spots 1, 2, and 4 are taken on the L's side
• a shooter that left the semi-circle early
• a missed foul call

This must be Old School and one of his college games.