The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 10:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
Send a message via MSN to IREFU2 Send a message via Yahoo to IREFU2
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
...But [maybe] with shots.
Can you clarify?
__________________
Score the Basket!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 11:26am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by IREFU2
Can you clarify?
In an obviously poorly written response to Mark T calling a team control a common foul, which it is, I metaphorically miscued an exemplary example of why the common foul is not a straight-up match to the definition of a PC/TC.

I guess my post was not intuitively obvious to every casual observer with it being common knowledge that free throws are not awarded on TC/PC fouls.

But I am really sorry I even posted.

Sorry !
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 11:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
Send a message via MSN to IREFU2 Send a message via Yahoo to IREFU2
Quote:
Originally Posted by mick
In an obviously poorly written response to Mark T calling a team control a common foul, which it is, I metaphorically miscued an exemplary example of why the common foul is not a straight-up match to the definition of a PC/TC.

I guess my post was not intuitively obvious to every casual observer with it being common knowledge that free throws are not awarded on TC/PC fouls.

But I am really sorry I even posted.

Sorry !
No problem, I understand, but others may not.
__________________
Score the Basket!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 11:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 572
I know you think I understood what you were trying to say, etc, etc, etc
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 12:06pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankHtown
I know you think I understood what you were trying to say, etc, etc, etc
I hear that, Franktown !!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 01:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC_Ref12
Team B is in the bonus. A1 is driving towards his basket when B1 establishes LGP in A1's path. A1 jumps in the air to attempt a shot but before contacting B1, passes the ball off. While the ball is in the air between A1 and A2, A1 contacts B1 and sends them both to the floor.

IF you have a foul here, what is your call?

a) PC foul on A1, no FTs
b) Team control foul, no FTs
c) common foul, B1 to shoot FT(s)
As others have said...b. But, now that we have the TC foul, it is almost redundant to have the PC foul too. In all but one case, they are exactly the same.

The team control foul is a common foul commited by a player on the team that has control of the ball. A player holding or dribbling the ball technically commits a PC foul but nothing about it is differnet than the TC foul...same action, same time period, same penalty, just that the player also has player control.

The ONLY part that is different is the airborne shooter part.

They could effectively combine the TC and PC rules into a singe type of foul and add the airborne shooter clause to cover that and they'd have only one rule.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 02:14pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
They could effectively combine the TC and PC rules into a singe type of foul and add the airborne shooter clause to cover that and they'd have only one rule.
How about:

An offensive foul is a common foul
a. committed by a player while holding or dribbling the ball inbounds;
b. committed by a player whose team has team control at the time of the foul;
c. committed by an airborne shooter;
d. committed during a throw-in by a player on the team entitled to the throw-in, until the ball is controlled inbounds.

("d." is kind of awkward, but it's shorter than "committed by a player whose team is entitled to a throw-in; such foul being committed after the ball has become live to begin the throw-in and before the ball is controlled inbounds".)

MAJOR DISCLAIMER: This is NOT the current rule. It's my suggestion for how to re-write the rule so that we would have one type of foul for all "offensive"-type fouls, which might -- someday -- include fouls by the offense during a throw-in. Sorry for the confusion!

Last edited by Scrapper1; Wed May 09, 2007 at 05:51pm.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 02:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
Send a message via MSN to IREFU2 Send a message via Yahoo to IREFU2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
How about:

An offensive foul is a common foul
a. committed by a player while holding or dribbling the ball inbounds;
b. committed by a player whose team has team control at the time of the foul;
c. committed by an airborne shooter;
d. committed during a throw-in by a player on the team entitled to the throw-in, until the ball is controlled inbounds.

("d." is kind of awkward, but it's shorter than "committed by a player whose team is entitled to a throw-in; such foul being committed after the ball has become live to begin the throw-in and before the ball is controlled inbounds".)
Um, dont think there is team control in HS on throw-ins. You might want to check statement D.
__________________
Score the Basket!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 02:20pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by IREFU2
Um, dont think there is team control in HS on throw-ins. You might want to check statement D.
You might want to check the thread on the new NFHS rules...
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 02:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
Send a message via MSN to IREFU2 Send a message via Yahoo to IREFU2
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad
You might want to check the thread on the new NFHS rules...
Oh are the new rule in effect now or when the season begins?
__________________
Score the Basket!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 02:24pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by IREFU2
Oh are the new rule in effect now or when the season begins?
Well, around here we use start using them at all of our summer camps and clinics so coaches and players get used to them before next November when it counts...so I would say they are in effect now.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,673
Send a message via MSN to IREFU2 Send a message via Yahoo to IREFU2
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad
Well, around here we use start using them at all of our summer camps and clinics so coaches and players get used to them before next November when it counts...so I would say they are in effect now.
My mistake then!
__________________
Score the Basket!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 03:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 572
The only change having to do with throw-in's is that the throw-in ends when the ball is "legally" touched. I don't think they changed the status of no team control during a throw-in.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 03:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
How about:

An offensive foul is a common foul...
d. committed during a throw-in by a player on the team entitled to the throw-in, until the ball is controlled inbounds.
Team control (offensive foul) during a throw-in?? For NFHS?? Really?

Last edited by Vinski; Wed May 09, 2007 at 03:29pm.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 09, 2007, 03:35pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinski
Team control (offensive foul) during a throw-in?? For NFHS?? Really?
Really! Scrappy was talking about how the rule could possibly be re-written to combine PC and TC fouls, not what the rule actually is now. Neither you or IREFU2 comprehended that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
8.7 SITUATION A assignmentmaker Basketball 12 Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:44am
A no win situation schwinn Football 3 Sat Oct 01, 2005 11:36am
Just a Situation jrfath Football 5 Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:17am
What do we do in this situation? FUBLUE Softball 7 Thu Jan 29, 2004 04:06pm
DQ Situation Ron Basketball 4 Tue Nov 05, 2002 07:41am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1