Correct call ?

[Nevadaref]

Which is not the same as the end of the jurisdiction of the officials. So how is this dead ball any different?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Which is not the same as the end of the jurisdiction of the officials. So how is this dead ball any different?

The period is over. That's how it's different.

I agree with Tony.

[AFHusker]

Maybe a bailout, but the tech could be for a substitute not reporting to the scorer or being beckoned by an official. I'm sure both officials counted 5 players on each team before the foul so the 6th player must have been a sub.

[deecee]

nevada i think you read into the rules with x-ray vision. even this is a bit of a stretch. but i do admire your zeal in going after these 3rd world interpretations.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by deecee

i do admire your zeal in going after these 3rd world interpretations.

"I wish I had your passion, Ray. Misdirected though it might be,
it is still a passion."

[RefTip]

Clarification : The technical was for 6 men on the court ,,, not for illegal entry ( not being beckoned or reporting ) . Our coach asked the official the reason for the T and the official responded that it was b/c of 6 players on the floor.

Thanks for the input

Tip

[deecee]

6 players is not a T its a rare inverted violation as per 3.4 sitA.

the penalty is the offending coach gets tickled by the hamburglar while ronald mcdonald watches.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

The period is over. That's how it's different.

I agree with Tony.

So let's move this to the end of the third quarter. The officials only notice that there were six team members out there after the horn has sounded and the teams are on their way to their benches for the one-minute intermission. What have you got?

Or how about if the stoppage is for a full time-out in the middle of the second quarter, and then rest happens the same as above?