traveling question

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

It might be good to speak in layman terms, but when talking about counts has nothing to do with what the rules says. If I land on one foot and that is your pivot feet, then you can step (or count) as many times with the other foot.

The laymen and I all seem to agree that the "count" refers to different foot or feet landing in sequence. The "moves" in question are all made while "moving." When you stop and pat the same foot over and over, it is no longer a "count." Up to now, this explanation has been very well received, and apparently, reasonably well understood, which is more than I can say for "Over the back is not a foul."

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by just another ref

The laymen and I all seem to agree that the "count" refers to different foot or feet landing in sequence. The "moves" in question are all made while "moving." When you stop and pat the same foot over and over, it is no longer a "count." Up to now, this explanation has been very well received, and apparently, reasonably well understood, which is more than I can say for "Over the back is not a foul."

I do not make the statement because of how it is received. I want them to understand that the language I use and most officials use is not related to counts. Now when I was playing I do not recall using the term counts as a part of what was or what was not a travel.

BTW, I have used to much success the comment, "Over the back is not a foul." But I usually back it up with what the rule is or "there is nothing special with the back, he was in his vertical space (or bigger and out jumped your player). The success that I have had is more about directing the conversation whether than if they like it or not. I would rather a coach to stop using a term that does not apply then worry about if they agree with me.

Peace