backcourt violation?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP

What's your NFHS ruling, Nevada? Do you agree that this batting equates passing, which equates team control, which results in a violation?

Um...you may want to read NFHS case book play 4.12.6 Also see case book play 4.19.7SitC which states that there's no team control following a deflected ball during a throw-in.

You're wrong.

[HawkeyeCubP]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Um...you may want to read NFHS case book play 4.12.6

You're wrong.

I see what you're saying here Jurassic. I mentioned this case play earlier in the thread, but I wasn't thinking it applied to an intentional bat from a player to a teammate. I read the case play as A2 is trying to catch/deflecting the ball, not batting it to a teammate.

But since the case play doesn't specify what type of "touching" is going on, I guess I'll defer.

[HawkeyeCubP]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Um...you may want to read NFHS case book play 4.12.6 Also see case book play 4.19.7SitC which states that there's no team control following a deflected ball during a throw-in.

You're wrong.

And to go off-track, doesn't the language of 4.12.6 and 4.19.7.D contradict each other? I remember a thread from not too long ago where Nevada and I think you and others were debating the whole "when does the throw-in end" deal, regarding to the throw-in being touched/deflected. 4.12.6 says the throw-in ended when the player touched the ball, but 4.19.7.D implies that even after the touch, the throw-in is still occuring during the foul that follows the touch.

[HawkeyeCubP]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Um...you may want to read NFHS case book play 4.12.6 Also see case book play 4.19.7SitC which states that there's no team control following a deflected ball during a throw-in.

You're wrong.

To use my own logic, touching precedes batting, so the the two case book situations are completely applicable.

Thank you.