Throw-in/Backcourt violation?

[Nevadaref]

I don't see your point.

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

There is currently a debate on whether the words in the parenthetical are the ONLY three times that such action is permitted, since they used to be the three exceptions prior to the rewording of the rule, or if they are merely three examples of a player from the team not in control and other occasions of this are also allowed by the now more inclusive wording.
BktBallRef who is basically our backcourt guru has taken the former stance, while I have supported the latter.

Are you on my side of this debate or BktBallRef's?

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

I don't see your point.

I forget the question.

Are you on my side of this debate or BktBallRef's?

OP #1 is not a violation. Whose side does that put me on?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by just another ref

OP #1 is not a violation. Whose side does that put me on?

Mine. You may want to watch where you step. The ground has been known to be shaky over here on the opposite side from where Tony is standing, especially when it comes to backcourt.