![]() |
|
|
|||
NFHS Question 47/Thoughts
Ok, this question got me thinking. I got the question correct, but...
Suppose Team A is leading 45-20, with 3:00 remaining in the fourth quarter, both Team A and Team B are in the bonus. A1 through A9 are disqualified. Therefore, A10 is the only remaining player. Of course, it's in the referee's judgment that Team A has a chance to win. So, anytime Team B scores, we know that A must have a player on team B touch the ball or it's a violation, etc. My question is concerning 8-1-4b: The first marked lane spaces (the lane spaces adjacent to the end line) shall be occupied by opponents of the free thrower. No teammate of the free thrower may occupy either of these marked lane spaces. Alright, so Team B is driving, A10 fouls B6. Now, we are shooting free throws. Team A isn't going to be able to satisfy 8-1-4b. So, does this result in a delay and then a technical foul on Team A for not occupying both lane spaces? Or does it result in a delayed violation on Team A? What's the call? |
|
|||
Quote:
It is not the intention of the rules to have a violation and/or technical foul on team A everytime B shoots a FT just because the rest of the players are fouled out or injured. No T or violation on team A.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Tanner, my man, I'm WAY ahead of you...
![]() 2003-04 NFHS BASKETBALL RULES INTERPRETATIONS SITUATION 2: Team A started the game with seven team members in the scorebook. All team members foul out but one, A1. Team A is leading by eight points with 38 seconds left in the game with a chance to win. A1 fouls B2 with Team B in the bonus. A1 occupies one of the first marked lane spaces for the free throw, with no teammate to occupy the other required space. RULING: By rule, a team may continue to play with one player if that team has an opportunity to win the game. Accordingly, since Team A can only put one player in the required free-throw marked lane space, it cannot be penalized. Further, Team B may not occupy the first marked lane space left vacant by Team A. (3-1-1 Note, 8-1-3) How did I know that this ruling existed? I wrote it on this very forum and someone took it and submitted it to the NFHS. |
|
|||
I'll try to locate the thread in which I posted what became the Interp ruling, but for now, here's the thread in which I first inquired about this play back in 2002!
![]() One player left |
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Edit: Thanks Nevada for digging up the old thread. Great stuff to start off my Friday morning! It appears my orginal thinking was in line with a few others until they officially made the ruling. Last edited by tjones1; Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 08:14am. |
|
|||
There's some great stuff in those old threads!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NFHS Question 68 | kraz423 | Basketball | 47 | Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:06am |
NFHS Question 24 | MrRabbit | Softball | 15 | Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:58pm |
NFHS question #9 | shipwreck | Softball | 6 | Wed Aug 24, 2005 06:31pm |
Question #99 NFHS | RookieDude | Basketball | 22 | Thu Nov 11, 2004 01:04pm |
NFHS Question | eevans | Soccer | 1 | Mon Aug 13, 2001 09:52pm |