The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   WARNING!! Annual Off-Topic Baseball Thread. Esteemed Members BEWARE!! (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/25929-warning-annual-off-topic-baseball-thread-esteemed-members-beware.html)

Dan_ref Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:18am

I think we should blame Kenny Rogers for getting goop all over the ball the other day.

btw....big news out of the windy city today

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/54216

M&M Guy Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:20am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
I think we should blame Kenny Rogers for getting goop all over the ball the other day.

btw....big news out of the windy city today

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/54216

:p <font =font>

Jurassic Referee Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:35pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainmaker

doggone it! someone always beats me to the really pithy observations!!

Not true. You're noted for making pithy observations.
I can't begin to tell you how many times that I've heard "Well, that's another pithy observation from Rainmaker".

Feel better now, thithter?

jritchie Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:53pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Well, monkey muffins!

I still put most of the blame on Zumaya, because the 1-5-3 DP isn't standard (hence the stat they found). If I were Inge, I wouldn't have been expecting a throw, unless the ball had been hit softer. Maybe part of the reason he wasn't there was because it was hit sharply, and he didn't have the time to get there yet.

I do know pitchers work on the 1-6-3 plays all the time, (and sometimes the 1-4-3, depending on the defensive alignment). It's so much easier for the pitcher to throw at 2nd base, and have the shortstop take the throw while their momentum is taking them towards 1st.

You know there were no outs in the inning, did anyone ever think about the possiblility of the TRIPLE PLAY! the batter did have a leg injury and can't get down the line so it was a good possiblility that is what he may of been thinking...probably wouldn't of gotten it, but still could of gotten two of the 3 anyways....

Dan_ref Wed Oct 25, 2006 01:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Not true. You're noted for making pithy observations.
I can't begin to tell you how many times that I've heard "Well, that's another pithy observation from Rainmaker".

Feel better now, thithter?

Don't forget to tuck your whistle in your shirt while making a pithy observation

mick Wed Oct 25, 2006 01:44pm

Cubs fans
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Well, monkey muffins!

If I were Inge, I wouldn't have been expecting a throw, unless the ball had been hit softer. Maybe part of the reason he wasn't there was because it was hit sharply, and he didn't have the time to get there yet.

Oh, my ! Hit softly the only play is at 1B

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
I do know pitchers work on the 1-6-3 plays all the time, (and sometimes the 1-4-3, depending on the defensive alignment). It's so much easier for the pitcher to throw at 2nd base, and have the shortstop take the throw while their momentum is taking them towards 1st.

Oh, my ! Who takes the throw depends on batter's side of the plate or batter's proclivity.

http://www.clicksmilies.com/s0105/tr...smiley-064.gif

M&M Guy Wed Oct 25, 2006 02:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mick
Oh, my ! Hit softly the only play is at 1B.

Maybe, but the ball was hit on the third base side of the mound. But, that's my whole point, Inge wasn't expecting the throw, so why should he hurry to get there?

Quote:

Originally Posted by mick
Oh, my ! Who takes the throw depends on batter's proclivity.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Look, I was just trying to help take one of those kids off the hook. And lord knows I certainly don't know how to behave as a fan of a team in a W.S. :(

mick Wed Oct 25, 2006 03:57pm

more Cubs fans
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
Maybe, but the ball was hit on the third base side of the mound. But, that's my whole point, Inge wasn't expecting the throw, so why should he hurry to get there?

Runners on first and second, no outs.
Ground ball anywhere (particularly left side) F5 momentum is moving toward (attacking) the ball.
By the time F1 has the ball, F5 is already moving in and must only vary his path slightly to get to 3B.

On only one of the three counts, (left-side, momentum and runner coming) Inge is normally there. He didn't have to be expecting the throw (certainly not the throw into left field), but he had to be there. Hadta be a bad jump and a brain cramp!

...And Monroe is out in left, ...just enjoying the game in the infield. :)

M&M Guy Wed Oct 25, 2006 04:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mick
...And Monroe is out in left, ...just enjoying the game in the infield. :)

That's one we definitely agree on.

I was always taught as an outfielder to back up the infield, even on routine grounders. Do major leaguers feel they don't need to do that anymore? Maybe major leaguers don't make as many errors and mistakes as little leaguers, but do they not do it because they're told to not worry about it, or because kids these days just don't know some of the basics?

(Dang it, my old-fogey grumpiness is showing again...)

mick Wed Oct 25, 2006 04:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
That's one we definitely agree on.

I was always taught as an outfielder to back up the infield, even on routine grounders. Do major leaguers feel they don't need to do that anymore? Maybe major leaguers don't make as many errors and mistakes as little leaguers, but do they not do it because they're told to not worry about it, or because kids these days just don't know some of the basics?


Let me say that C-Mo (Craig Monroe) is one of my favorites, too. Fine player.
He's watching and he sees the pitcher with the ball. Maybe he's already shading toward the area behind 2B where "just everyone knows" the ball is headed.


:)

rainmaker Wed Oct 25, 2006 06:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Not true. You're noted for making pithy observations.
I can't begin to tell you how many times that I've heard "Well, that's another pithy observation from Rainmaker".

Feel better now, thithter?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Don't forget to tuck your whistle in your shirt while making a pithy observation

I feel much better now. It's very sweet of you-all to be so, uh... encouraging? :p

Nevadaref Wed Oct 25, 2006 07:09pm

RAIN delay in St. Louis!

Jurassic Referee Wed Oct 25, 2006 07:27pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref
RAIN delay in St. Louis!

Thank you, Wanda the Weather Woman.

M&M Guy Thu Oct 26, 2006 09:39am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Thank you, Wanda the Weather Woman.

It looks like Wanda is forecasting rain again tonight as well, right Wanda?

I found out I know 2 different people that managed to get a ticket for last night's game, and made the 2 1/2 hr. drive down there, all for nothing. (They are both Cardinal fans, so my sympathy level isn't too high...) Anyway, just an interesting tidbit - I would've thought since they had game 4 tickets, that their makeup date would also be game 4 - tonight. But it's not, their makeup date for those tickets is actually Friday night's game, which was originally scheduled as a travel date. So, I would assume if tonight's game is rained out, those people might get a Sat. game in St. Louis, and then the games in Detroit would be moved to Sunday and Monday? Or would they skip Monday to not go up against Monday Night Football?

I'm glad I'm not in the scheduling business.

mick Thu Oct 26, 2006 09:50am

Quote:

Originally Posted by M&M Guy
I found out I know 2 different people that managed to get a ticket for last night's game, and made the 2 1/2 hr. drive down there, all for nothing.

In 2-1/2 hours, I can get:
1/2-way to Green Bay
1/2-way to Duluth
1/2-way to Madison
1/2-way to the Lower Peninsula.

:(


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1