Intentional Foul in act of shooting & the try is successful…

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by johnny1784

I feel there is an error in the Rule Book publication.

There is no error. The book is clear.

Two free throws if intentional or flagrant, plus ball for throw-in.

It makes no difference whether there's a shot or not. That's why it's unnecessary to address whether the shot is good or not good.

[johnny1784]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

There is no error. The book is clear.

Two free throws if intentional or flagrant, plus ball for throw-in.

It makes no difference whether there's a shot or not. That's why it's unnecessary to address whether the shot is good or not good.

IMO, the above statement should be noted in the Rule Book.

[BktBallRef]

Well, when you get on the NFHS Rule Committee, feel free to make the change.

Doesn't the Case Book clarify it for you? Tha'ts what the Case Book does. That's why it's there. It's a necessary supplement to the Rule Book?

Let me ask you this. A1 is fouled in the act of shooting. As he goes to the line, you wanr him to tuck his shirt tail in. He doesn't and takes his first FT. Now what do you do and where can I find it in the Rule Book?

[johnny1784]

• I will join the committee and recommend another change to exclude old squirrels without a nut.

• The Case Book is used to illustrate in written form a better understanding of the Rule Book. It supplements a given rule.

• There is no defining clarification in the NFHS Rule Book for an intentional foul when a try is successful or unsuccessful as there is with the Case Book.

• For your situation, I would allow the shot to be taken and then have the shooter removed from the game.

Now what should you do when you are ready to administer the ball to A1 and he/she is not ready and is outside the semi-circle conversing with teammates or fans?

Have a nice day.