The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 15, 2006, 10:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 271
I understand the premise of advantage/disadvantage. Recently I have heard many refs making calls, or not making them, based on advantage/disadvantage alone. Real life example: A1 is dribbling up sideline to break a press. B1 is running along side but is taking an angle that bumps A1 enough off her line, that if she would continue to run/dribble, momentum would take her out of bounds. She was on a perfect parallel line to sideline before the "minor" bump. The coach yelled, "no call?" and the ref said, "did she gain advantage coach?", implying he thought the defender had not gained advantage by the bump. However, it appeared to me that the bump gave her advantage as it forced A1 to pull up her dribble or go out of bounds (should she have contiued out of bounds to try to draw the call but then risk a turnover?). Does the advantage/disadvantage put us in an "disadvantageous" spot by ignoring contact we might normally call but focus on whether or not advantage was gained? Are there times when we should dispense with adv/disadv? Are there times when using adv/disadv is imperative to making the right call?
__________________
All of us learn to write in the second grade. Most of us go on to greater things.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1