![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
News flash: ugly rules make for ugly argument
Quote:
The official needs definite knowledge of 1 second lag time for us to allow a full second. It still comes down to this: Official looking at clock at whistle, lag time up to 1 second. Official not looking, lag time is the interval between whistle and look. Stop spinning it JR. [/B][/QUOTE] Perhaps all errors in stopping the clock (note: starting may not be parallel) can be divided into the two classes BZ has been talking about, based on whether or not the Official is or is not looking at the clock at the moment the whistle sounds? In cases where the official is NOT looking at the clock when he or she blows the whistle, however long it actually takes to look at and read the clock is to be presumed to have been at least 1-second; thus any 'timer's lag time' has been accounted for by incorporation, and what the official sees is how much time is left. (5.10.1B) In cases where the official is looking at the clock when he or she blows the whistle (5.10.1D), let's call the time on the clock at the whistle T. If the timer stops the clock at T, fine. If at T minus 1-second, go with that, allowing for 'Timer's Lag Time'. However, if the difference between what the official sees and what ends up on the clock is greater than T minus 1-second, whether or not there was 'timer's lag time' is presumed to be unknowable: put the full T back on the clock.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|