Quote:
Originally posted by Daryl H. Long
That is just it, in the play in question, we don't know one way or the other if the official had definite knowledge or not, because Nevada left that out.
I've been saying all along, that the play as described could be game over or X amount of time going back on the clock.
|
Unbelievable.
Complete waste of time. [/B][/QUOTE]
JR
I agree totally. Why would BlindZebra feel the need argue for hours (right or wrong) to the point of wanting to knock a hole in your brick wall because he thought your answer was wrong, and then make a final post of you could do it either way? Whether we agree or not at the least we should have enough conviction to stick with one answer. Could have saved a lot of writing and reading time if we accept two totally opposite ways to handle one situation and both are correct.
[/B][/QUOTE]
I was saying both were possible, depending on when the official looked, from my second post.
My argument was never I was right and JR was wrong with our ruling, it was that we never had that information from the post, so saying it was definitely one without qualifying it was wrong.
Go back and look.