|
|||
1. B-1 Reaches through the plane of the boundary line and fouls thrower-in A-1. Official charges B-1 with an intentional personal foul and issues a warning to team B. Is the official correct?
2. While A-1's try is in flight, A-2 fouls B-2. The try is successful. Team B is not in the bonus. Official rules team B's throw-in is a designated spot throw-in. Is the official correct? 3. A-1's try hits the ring and bounces straight up in the imaginary cylinder above the ringt livel, when B-1 touches the basket. Official rules this basket interference. Is the official correct? 4. B-1, while playing the ball causes excessive contact. Official rules this an intentional personal foul. IS the official correct? 5. A double personal foul is charged while team A is in countrol. Official awards the ball to team A nearest the spot of the foul. Is the official correct?
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
|
|||
Quote:
As I said, I'm not going to give you the answers, b/c #1-#4 are pretty basic questions. Why don't you tell us your answers and why you chose them. Then we can tell you where you need to brush up. Quote:
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
I'm away at college and I forgot my rulebooks back home. I'm just going by experience and what I remember. That's why I'm asking you guys, normally, I'd just look them up.
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
|
|||
1. B-1 Reaches through the plane of the boundary line and fouls thrower-in A-1. Official charges B-1 with an intentional personal foul and issues a warning to team B. Is the official correct? I say no, because I don't think you need to give a warning along with the Intentional. 2. While A-1's try is in flight, A-2 fouls B-2. The try is successful. Team B is not in the bonus. Official rules team B's throw-in is a designated spot throw-in. Is the official correct? I can't remember whether B can run the endline or take the spot. 3. A-1's try hits the ring and bounces straight up in the imaginary cylinder above the ringt livel, when B-1 touches the basket. Official rules this basket interference. Is the official correct? BI can only happen if the ring is touched when the ball is on the ring. 4. B-1, while playing the ball causes excessive contact. Official rules this an intentional personal foul. IS the official correct? Excessive contact does not constitute an intentional foul. 5. A double personal foul is charged while team A is in countrol. Official awards the ball to team A nearest the spot of the foul. Is the official correct? POI is wherever A had the ball, not where the foul occured.
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
|
|||||
Quote:
You charge the intentional immediately, but you also issue the warning. That way, the next time somebody breaks the plane, it's a T and not simply the initial warning. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
1. I think it's dumb to charge both. In fact, as soon as the defender crosses the plane, the official should blow it dead for the warning. Then if there is contact, it has to be a T. So either penalize just the intentional personal, or not havethe possibility of an intentional personal. Since that is not true, you only penalize one. I say the official is wrong. 2. I say No. I believe the Fed wants to not take away B's chance to run the endline. 3. No BI. With the ball in the cylinder, you can't touch the ball. When the ball is touching the rim, you can't touch the ball, net, rim. or flange. 4. Yes. 5. By the strictest definition, the game was interrupted where A had the ball. Throw-in from there.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Quote:
The correct answer is charge an intentional foul and report a DOG warning. Shoot 2 FTs and give the ball back to A at the spot. BTW, your scenario is the same, you simply changed the sequence. You said, "as soon as the defender crosses the plane, the official should blow it dead for the warning. Then if there is contact, it has to be a T." The penalty phase is almost identical. Report the DOG warning, assess the T, have any player on A shoot the 2 FTs and give Team A the ball at the division line. IOW, your solution is no different than the NFHS ruling that you oppose.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Quote:
With the exceptions that one foul is a T and one is a personal foul. They usually have different impacts on the way that player plays. If the official had a provision to blow the play dead as soon as the plane was broken, he might prevent continued action and prevent a foul. In other words, my solution is different. Edit: correct italic tag. [Edited by JugglingReferee on Nov 21st, 2005 at 11:14 PM]
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
FWIW
Quote:
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
|
|||
Quote:
10.3.11SITUATION C: Team A scores near the end of the fourth quarter and is trailing by one point. B1 has the ball and is moving along the end-line to make the throw-in. A2 steps out of bounds and fouls B1. Is the foul personal or technical? RULING: This is an intentional personal foul. The time remaining to be played or whether Team A had previously been warned for violating the throw-in plane is not a factor. If the team had not been warned, the foul constitutes the warning. Casebook play 9.2.11 covers the companion situation- knocking the ball out of the thrower's hand. The ruling is a technical foul and a delay warning. |
|
|||
Quote:
1-Y 2-Y 3-Y 4-N 5-N ball is placed at the POI.
__________________
Score the Basket!!!! |
|
|||
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|