Quote:
Originally posted by JugglingReferee
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
IOW, your solution is no different than the NFHS ruling that you oppose. 
|
With the exceptions that one foul is a T and one is a personal foul. They usually have different impacts on the way that player plays.
If the official had a provision to blow the play dead as soon as the plane was broken, he might prevent continued action and prevent a foul.
In other words, my solution is different.
|
Yup, your solution sure is different-- different than case book play 10.3.11SitC.
10.3.11SITUATION C:
Team A scores near the end of the fourth quarter and is trailing by one point. B1 has the ball and is moving along the end-line to make the throw-in. A2 steps out of bounds and fouls B1. Is the foul personal or technical?
RULING: This is an intentional personal foul. The time remaining to be played or whether Team A had previously been warned for violating the throw-in plane is not a factor.
If the team had not been warned, the foul constitutes the warning.
Casebook play 9.2.11 covers the companion situation- knocking the ball out of the thrower's hand. The ruling is a technical foul
and a delay warning.