Tue Nov 22, 2005, 02:38am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
|
|
|
FWIW
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by JugglingReferee
1. I think it's dumb to charge both. In fact, as soon as the defender crosses the plane, the official should blow it dead for the warning. Then if there is contact, it has to be a T. So either penalize just the intentional personal, or not havethe possibility of an intentional personal. Since that is not true, you only penalize one. I say the official is wrong.
|
The official is wrong. That is, the official JugglingReferee is wrong. 
The correct answer is charge an intentional foul and report a DOG warning. Shoot 2 FTs and give the ball back to A at the spot.
BTW, your scenario is the same, you simply changed the sequence. You said, "as soon as the defender crosses the plane, the official should blow it dead for the warning. Then if there is contact, it has to be a T." The penalty phase is almost identical. Report the DOG warning, assess the T, have any player on A shoot the 2 FTs and give Team A the ball at the division line. IOW, your solution is no different than the NFHS ruling that you oppose. 
|
It is different, is it not, in that in one case the throw-in will come from the division line opposite the table and in the other case from the spot of the foul?
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
|