![]() |
|
|||
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: thanks for the replies
Quote:
It the philosophy of 7.5.7 that applies, not the actual case. [/B][/QUOTE]Great. So.......if A1 makes an AP throw-in and B1 is the first to touch that throw-in while standing on the sideline, the philosophy of 7.5.7 as interpreted by C. Rust sez that A will get a repeat throw-in and also keep the arrow. And.....if A1 makes an AP throw-in and A2 first touches the throw-in while standing on a sideline, the philosophy of 7.5.7 as also interpreted by C Rust sez that B will get a throw-in now but A will still retain the arrow. Or....if A1 is making an AP throw-in and a teammate runs OOB to get a pass along the line from him, the philosophy of 7.5.7 sez that B gets a throw-in now but A will still retain the arrow. Right? Because the penalty for those violations are the only consequence of the play....according to you? And the original throw-in by A1 can't end according to you also because the throw-in definition in the rule book doesn't mention those violations above either? Great philosophy you got there, Camron. I wanna be there when you apply it. ![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|