The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 18, 2005, 10:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 348
This is for a 3-man crew situation:

A1 shoots and misses and B1 rebounds and quickly takes it the other way.

I was told by a D-1 college official that the C has the responsibility to call everything from foul line extended on one end to foul line extended on the other end during a fast break, quick outlet, or pressing action.

A high school official told me in this case that it was the lead because he was in front of the play.

To me it makes more since for the C to take it because he supposed to run with the ball.

Who is right? Or are both right according to their respective levels?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 18, 2005, 11:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
The center.

The lead is transitioning to the other end. Making a call while looking over your shoulder shouldn't be done unless it's absolutely necessary. He should hustle to the baseline, while keeping an eye on what's going on behind him.

The center is moving with the ball from FT line to FT line.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 18, 2005, 11:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 572
I was taught that C, in transition, had top of key to top of key, all the way across the court, which means you may have to step on the court to sell a call on the far sideline.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 18, 2005, 05:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 88
The C has it all the way at both levels.
__________________
Andre' Stevenson
In The Heart & Soul of Georgia's HS Basketball
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 06:48am
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
While the C does have the plays from sideline to sideline the C does not necessarily have the ball. It would probably be better to say the C has the pack in transition and from 3-point line to 3-point line during a press as long as the Trail has players he must watch further back in the backcourt.

I had a game on Sunday and my partner called a foul on a player around half-court on my side of the court. In this particular situation I had the ball as the trail since the press was broken and the other players were now moving up the court. From his angle he saw contact. From my angle, trailing the play, I saw that the defender and dribbler were going in straight lines up the court until the dribbler decided to move towards/slightly in front of the defender to initiate contact. Like previously discussed in another thread the defender did not do anything illegal. He didn't do anything except run up the court. If my partner would have noticed where the majority of the players were on this play he would have realized that I didn't have anyone else to look at so I had this play.
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 07:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by tomegun
While the C does have the plays from sideline to sideline the C does not necessarily have the ball. It would probably be better to say the C has the pack in transition and from 3-point line to 3-point line during a press as long as the Trail has players he must watch further back in the backcourt.
I didn't say that he has the ball. I said he is moving with the ball on a fast break.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 08:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
[QUOTE] From my angle, trailing the play, I saw that the defender and dribbler were going in straight lines up the court until the dribbler decided to move towards/slightly in front of the defender to initiate contact. Like previously discussed in another thread the defender did not do anything illegal. He didn't do anything except run up the court. QUOTE]

Tomegun, are you saying you wouldn't make the call because the dribbler initiated the contact or because the contact was not bad enough to call a foul based on the dribbler initiating the contact?
__________________
foulbuster
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 08:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
I think he's saying that the defender didn't foul.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 08:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
I think he's saying that the defender didn't foul.
This is just toooo simple of an answer. Totally not fair.
__________________
foulbuster
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 08:55am
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
Quote:
Originally posted by Bart Tyson
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
I think he's saying that the defender didn't foul.
This is just toooo simple of an answer. Totally not fair.
I'll simplify it even more. The defender didn't do anything wrong.

The contact was called because the dribbler moved into/next to the defender's path. We will never know what the outcome of the contact would have been but it wouldn't be fair to call a foul on someone that didn't do anything. More than likely the dribbler would have had to live with the outcome of his actions. If I was to run all the scenarios (losing the ball, falling down, traveling, etc.) through my head I can't see where the defender would be at fault.
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Told ya, Bart.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
OK, lets make it complicated. The defender does not have legal guarding position. I can see the dribbler initiating contact and we have a foul on the defender. I'm not refering to your play b/c I think you made it clear there was not a foul. I know you didn't say the following as a blanket statement, However, I don't think we can say anytime a dribbler initiates contact then we don't have a foul.
__________________
foulbuster
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 02:29pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by Bart Tyson
OK, lets make it complicated. The defender does not have legal guarding position. I can see the dribbler initiating contact and we have a foul on the defender. I'm not refering to your play b/c I think you made it clear there was not a foul. I know you didn't say the following as a blanket statement, However, I don't think we can say anytime a dribbler initiates contact then we don't have a foul.
No, but I think that all Tom is saying is that in his particular situation the dribbler initiated the contact illegally, and he had a no-call on the play when his partner's whistle went--but if Tom had to call a foul, it woulda been on the dribbler. Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but it's a case where the dribbler and defender both established straight-line paths side-by-each, and then the dribbler veered out of his path either into or slightly in front of the defender. In cases like those, LGP basically doesn't mean everything. However, screening principles do apply to the dribbler. The dribbler has to give the defender room to stop- usually a maximum of 2 steps. FED casebook play 10.6.2SitB-COMMENT kinda lays out the principle. It's a HTBT type of play with regards as to whether you're gonna call a foul or not imo.

The other comment by Tom was legitimate too, I thought. He was trail and this play was in his primary. His partner at C reached across the floor to get the call. That one is a "wtf you doing,Willis" in the dressing room later.

Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 03:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,517
I totally agree Mr. Jurassic Referee.
__________________
foulbuster
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 19, 2005, 04:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by Bart Tyson
However, I don't think we can say anytime a dribbler initiates contact then we don't have a foul.
I don't think anybody did.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1