Officiating philosophy

[mu4scott]

I'm curious to hear what you veteran posters think about Welmer's philosophy at the start of a game.

[just another ref]

I don't think much of it at all. To suggest that home or visitor makes any difference in any call is basically a bad idea. Seems mainly like a guy showing off in front of the camera to me.

[JRutledge]

You do not care what we think, so why answer.

Peace

[JugglingReferee]

I don't know what a 150%-er call is, nor am I sure I know know what a 90%-er is.

When I see something that needs to be called, it is called. I don't care which team it is on, nor if it's a violation, foul, or held ball.

I also think the video is poor because not once did we see a pants-pull.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

I don't know what a 150%-er call is, nor am I sure I know know what a 90%-er is.

When I see something that needs to be called, it is called. I don't care which team it is on, nor if it's a violation, foul, or held ball.

I also think the video is poor because not once did we see a pants-pull.

That's a production oversight that will be corrected in the editing room.

[mu4scott]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You do not care what we think, so why answer.

Peace

As long as I can comprehend what you write I always care.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by mu4scott

As long as I can comprehend what you write I always care.

You do not comprehend what you are writing. You I guess you really do not care.

Peace

[mu4scott]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

You do not comprehend what you are writing. You I guess you really do not care.

Peace

Your honor I rest my case.