Casebook 7.5.7 sit A.

[Raymond]

The case play showed examples of a violation prior to a player control foul and after play control foul. If you are confused by that, shame on you after all these years of officiating. If you are not confused, we don't need you to play proxy for new officials. Let them ask their own questions.

Let new officials learn. Don't dominate the room.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Raymond

The case play showed examples of a violation prior to a player control foul and after play control foul. If you are confused by that, shame on you after all these years of officiating.

No I'm not confused. Just saying that a casebook play comparing apples to apples would have made it simpler for those who have not officiated all these years.

Wondering why the NFHS took that approach, maybe to kill two birds with one stone, jamming both basket interference and goaltending into one casebook play, with one rationale based on something not being a try, a rationale that doesn't quite fit the other violation.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

No I'm not confused. Just saying that a casebook play comparing apples to apples would have made it simpler for those who have not officiated all these years.

...

So you ARE playing proxy. Let the room breathe. Let somebody who may be confused ask the questions that help them understand it the best.



Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Raymond

Let the room breathe. Let somebody who may be confused ask the questions that help them understand it the best.

You caught me. I would love them posting on the Forum, but it's always the same old farts (just kidding, except for Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.).

I watch the "View" numbers so I know that there are non-posters lurking out there, some of them are probably young'uns.

Young'uns, please post.