1:58.30 mark travel or foul or neither?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I have only a foul.

Peace

I'm not even convinced it's a foul

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I'm not even convinced it's a foul

Well honestly I am not sure there is a foul either, but certainly not a travel. The Lead has a much better look at the play than we do. Coming right to her. But not a travel.

Peace

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I'm not even convinced it's a foul

Defender moved forward into the shooter's body (even kept moving forward after the initial illegal contact), no hand issues, just a body bump. Lead had a great look.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Defender moved forward into the shooter's body (even kept moving forward after the initial illegal contact), no hand issues, just a body bump. Lead had a great look.

I can make a case she stayed in front of her. It was not a slam dunk foul for sure.

Peace

[Camron Rust]

No travel...nice footwork and ball handling.

Two fouls.

1. armbar/handcheck that reroutes the dribbler as she's cutting across the top of the lane and trying to go to the basket. The defender is also stepping towards the dribbler so you could also call that a block. Either way, it knocks her off her path. If we're protecting freedom of movement, that should be called. We might be patient to see where it goes. If the shooter isn't able to turn the corner, I don't think you can pass on it.

2. The, on the far side, the dribbler got head and shoulders by, negating any LGP the defender may have had. The defender kept moving and was moving into contact with the shooter...the L had a perfect position to see it and made the call.