The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 13, 2019, 03:54pm
Stubborn Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,517
Backcourt Violation Editorial Change

The language doesn't clear up the issue that was discussed so much last season.

Situation: With Team A in the frontcourt, a pass from A1 is deflected by B1 in the air towards the backcourt. Does a player for Team A have to let the ball bounce in the backcourt before legally touching the ball?

I was hoping this editorial change would clear that up, but in the Ohio state rules meeting, we're told to call it the exact same way as last year. That doesn't help, either.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 13, 2019, 04:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanV21 View Post

Situation: With Team A in the frontcourt, a pass from A1 is deflected by B1 in the air towards the backcourt. Does a player for Team A have to let the ball bounce in the backcourt before legally touching the ball?

I was hoping this editorial change would clear that up, but in the Ohio state rules meeting, we're told to call it the exact same way as last year. That doesn't help, either.
1) No. That's the change. It's clear in the NFHS powerpoint

2) That depends on whether OH followed the rule last year. If not, then there won't be a change.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 13, 2019, 04:31pm
Stubborn Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
1) No. That's the change. It's clear in the NFHS powerpoint

2) That depends on whether OH followed the rule last year. If not, then there won't be a change.
Thanks. I finally got around to watching the state rules meeting online, and it wasn't made clear there at all. But I figured that's what it was alluding to.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 13, 2019, 04:37pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,952
And The Hits Just Keep On Coming ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanV21 View Post
I was hoping this editorial change would clear that up, but in the Ohio state rules meeting, we're told to call it the exact same way as last year. That doesn't help, either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
It's clear in the NFHS powerpoint.
Of course, it depends on who was explaining the PowerPoint.

__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 13, 2019, 04:56pm
This IS My Social Life
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: at L, T, or C
Posts: 2,379
If you really want to delve into depths of the somewhat twisted logic and reasoning behind the original debacle that caused it all and a correct understanding of the NFHS attempt at clarity all the way up to the expanded EXCEPTION stated in this year's rules book under 9-9-1, here's a tutorial that explains it in detail. Watch from the :56 second mark to 3:29 minute mark. Includes videos to illustrate what's legal. Not updated to accomodate the new phraseology in the new rules book because that really didn't add anything to what is legal anyway.

__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 13, 2019, 05:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,966
Yeah, the NFHS tends to mess things up then fumble through making the correction as they don't want to admit that they messed it up to begin with.

The interpretation that led to the rule "change" last year was bogus to begin with and everyone knew it.

All they had to do was redact the interpretation, but they couldn't do that. Would make too much sense.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 13, 2019, 05:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC Official View Post
Yeah, the NFHS tends to mess things up then fumble through making the correction as they don't want to admit that they messed it up to begin with.

The interpretation that led to the rule "change" last year was bogus to begin with and everyone knew it.

All they had to do was redact the interpretation, but they couldn't do that. Would make too much sense.
When you get a woman to admit that she was wrong, let me know!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 13, 2019, 05:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanV21 View Post
The language doesn't clear up the issue that was discussed so much last season.

Situation: With Team A in the frontcourt, a pass from A1 is deflected by B1 in the air towards the backcourt. Does a player for Team A have to let the ball bounce in the backcourt before legally touching the ball?

I was hoping this editorial change would clear that up, but in the Ohio state rules meeting, we're told to call it the exact same way as last year. That doesn't help, either.
Do you get a copy of the NFHS preseason guide? That document explains it very clearly and with pictures.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 14, 2019, 08:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE Ohio
Posts: 1,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Do you get a copy of the NFHS preseason guide? That document explains it very clearly and with pictures.
Unfortunately, we didnt, or at least I didnt and havent seen anyone at our locals, get the preseason guide this year in our packet.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 14, 2019, 09:53pm
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Toledo, Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB View Post
Unfortunately, we didnt, or at least I didnt and havent seen anyone at our locals, get the preseason guide this year in our packet.

The OhioHSAA did not include it in this year's packet. Another cutback while charging us an arm and a leg to register.

MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn.
Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials
International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials
Ohio High School Athletic Association
Toledo, Ohio
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4.19.8 C editorial change just another ref Basketball 30 Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:56am
9-1-3d NHFS Editorial Change ? ? ? Freddy Basketball 24 Thu Sep 17, 2009 05:19pm
Backcourt violation rule change? (over and back) HL Clippenchain Basketball 24 Thu Jan 24, 2008 01:27pm
Editorial change: What's the difference? Back In The Saddle Basketball 4 Sun Jul 31, 2005 12:28am
RRP FT editorial change Nevadaref Basketball 0 Mon Nov 01, 2004 02:42am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1