Travel after shooting foul

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

If obvious that a foul and travel, I enforce both (award free throws and take away the score). If not, I count the goal, and ignore the maybe-travel while awarding one free throw.

But that's not what you said.

Originally Posted by ilyazhito

I would cancel the score and award two shots, unless the foul directly contributed to the travel (the shooter was pushed and lost his balance, causing him to travel).

Nothing about a "maybe travel" in your earlier post.

"Unless the foul directly contributed to the travel".

Travel, not a "maybe travel".

Make up your mind.

Words do matter.

And they can come back to haunt you.

[ilyazhito]

Raymond's comments did change my perspective. Let's allow someone else to step into this discussion.

[Valley Man]

If you know the player has traveled after the foul, you must cancel the goal and shoot 2. Plain and simple. I really hope your "wordiness" is only in typed form. Round about logic on the floor in conversation with certain coaches about a call will cook your goose!!

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Valley Man

If you know the player has traveled after the foul, you must cancel the goal and shoot 2. Plain and simple.

Well said. As simple as do, re, me. As easy as one, two, three.

Originally Posted by Valley Man

Round about logic on the floor in conversation with certain coaches about a call will cook your goose!!

As will calls that do not conform with the rules, especially regarding high profile situations involving counting or not counting baskets.

Now everybody just sit back and enjoy some classic Jackson 5 from 1970. If you're of a certain age, you better know what song this is before you click, or you should be ashamed of yourself.

https://youtu.be/ho7796-au8U